Notice bibliographique
Résumé
November 2022 from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (PCCM): Start by reading my three Editor’s Choice articles (1−3) along with their accompanying editorials (4−6). Next, read about emergency medical care as this month’s educational theme highlighted in the section called PCCM Connections for Readers. Finally, before you move on to the other content in PCCM, read this month’s PCCM Narrative essay. WHAT CAN WE LEARN ABOUT INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL WORK-LIFE FACTORS AND MORAL DISTRESS IN PICU PRACTITIONERS? Lamiani G, Barlascini L, Borghi L, et al; Open Doors in INtensive care (ODIN) Study group 2: Moral Distress in the Italian PICUs: The Role of Individual and Organizational Factors (1). My first Editor’s Choice article comes from the Open Doors in Intensive Care (ODIN) study group comprising 23 PICUs in Italy. The ODIN group surveyed 635 of 874 eligible clinicians (75%) with the purpose of exploring the interplay between individual factors (i.e., sex, profession, years of experience, spiritual/religious belief, and resilience) and organizational factors (i.e., number of admissions, mortality rate, nurse-to-patient ratio, and parent presence) on staff moral distress (1). The accompanying editorial is thoughtful and informative (4). WHAT ARE THE OUTCOMES OF EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION (ECMO) IN CHILDREN WITH PRE-EXISTING DEFICITS IN NEUROLOGY OR DISABILITY? Dante AS, Carroll MK, Ng DK, et al; Pediatric ECMO (PediECMO) subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO): Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Outcomes in Children With Preexisting Neurologic Disorders or Neurofunctional Disability (2). My next Editor’s Choice article comes from the eight U.S. hospitals reporting to the Pediatric ECMO Outcomes Registry (PEDECOR) over a period of almost 8 years. The authors aimed to determine the prevalence and nature of pre-ECMO neurologic disorders or disability, and to investigate any association between such disorders with subsequent unfavorable outcomes (2). The accompanying editorial comes from experienced PCCM authors at centers in Boston, Sydney, and Toronto (5). Please read their insightful analysis of the PEDECOR report along with the article, and refer to recent PCCM articles on communication around the time of ECMO (7−9). WHAT ABOUT STANDARDIZING OUTCOME MEASURES FOR SURVIVORS OF PEDIATRIC CRITICAL ILLNESS? Pinto NP, Maddux AB, Dervan LA, et al; POST-PICU Investigators of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network (CPCCRN): A Core Outcome Measurement Set for Pediatric Critical Care (3). My third Editor’s Choice article is a multi-author, international Delphi consensus from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Pediatric Outcomes Studies after PICU (POST-PICU) investigators and the U.S. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network (CPCCRN). In this article, 35 expert investigators delineate measures to evaluate each of the domains in the PICU Core Outcome Sets (COS) (3). Our editorialists provide important discussion, and the hope is that by using the PALISI/CPCCRN POST-PICU consensus on COS, investigators will enable comparability across future research studies (6). PCCM CONNECTIONS FOR READERS The connections material this month focuses on the educational theme of delivering the best in emergency medical care. Each article comes with an editorial. First, there are two articles about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (10−13). One is about calcium administration for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in children with heart disease from the American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry (10), and the other is from the ICU-RESUScitation Project dataset. This work looks at the timing of the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in adaptations in our system of care for performing CPR, and temporal associations with CPR quality and outcomes after IHCA (12). Second in the theme of emergency care is an article about burns and mechanical ventilation (14,15). Third, we have an article about high-dose midazolam for refractory status epilepticus (16,17). Having read this materials on emergency care in our specialty (10−17), take the time to appreciate the report from Australia and New Zealand (18), with an editorial discussant from South Africa (19), describing national organization and the delivery of centralized PICU practice. Finally, before moving on to the other content that interests you, read the Narrative Essay called “Waves” (20); a reflection about new starts, stress, burnout, and the need to support each other.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,051 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,351 | 0,186 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».