MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4308675030 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7309021

Machine Learning Models to Accelerate the Design of Polymeric Long-Acting Injectables

2022· article· en· W4308675030 sur OpenAlexaff
Pauric Bannigan, Zeqing Bao, Riley J. Hickman, Matteo Aldeghi, Florian Häse, Alán Aspuru‐Guzik, Christine Allen

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueInjection Molding Process and Properties
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Long-acting injectables are considered one of the most promising therapeutic strategies for the treatment of chronic diseases as they can afford improved therapeutic efficacy, safety, and patient compliance. The use of polymer materials in such a drug formulation strategy can offer unparalleled diversity owing to the ability to synthesize materials with a wide range of properties. However, the interplay between multiple parameters, including the physicochemical properties of the drug and polymer, make it very difficult to intuitively predict the performance of these systems. This necessitates the development and characterization of a wide array of formulation candidates through extensive and time-consuming in vitro experimentation. Machine learning is enabling leap-step advances in a number of fields including drug discovery and materials science. Our study takes a critical step towards data-driven drug formulation development with an emphasis on long-acting injectables. A series of machine learning algorithms were trained and refined for accurate prediction of experimental drug release profiles using this dataset. The dataset was constructed from previously published studies by our research group and other research groups.The studies performed by our group include spherical and cylinder shaped polymeric LAIs. Data from external sources was identified using the Web of Science search engine and the keyword combination “polymeric microparticle” and “drug delivery”. Information related to the preparation, final composition, and release kinetics of drug from LAIs was collected. The latter was primarily extracted from figures of in vitro drug release profiles using the “GetData Graph Digitizer” application. The final dataset contained 181 drug release profiles for 43 unique drug-polymer combinations. In total this comprised 3783 individual fractional release measurements. The initially collected dataset was composed of a table of drug and polymer names, as well as physicochemical properties of the formulation, and fractional drug release values at various timepoints. In order to use this data to construct and train ML models it is necessary to describe various elements using machine-readable descriptors which were generated using RDkit. The polymers and LAI formulations were described exclusively using information reported in the relevant published articles, these included; polymer molecular weight (Polymer_MW), lactide-to-glycolide ratio (LA/GA; for non-PLGA systems this was set as zero), molecular crosslinking ratio of polymers (CL_Ratio; for non-cross-linked systems this was set as zero), initial drug-to-polymer ratio (Initial D/M ratio), drug loading capacity (DLC), surface area-to-volume (SA-V) ratio for the LAI system, fractional drug release at 6 h (T=0.25), fractional drug release at 12 h (T=0.5), fractional drug release at 24 h (T=1.0), and the precent of surfactant present in the release media (SE; where no surfactant was present in the release media, this was set as zero). With the exception of SA-V, T=0.25, T=0.5, and T=1.0, the 17 input features were either extracted from original publications or calculated using the RDkit package. SA-V was constructed and implemented for this study as it confers information that is related to the size and shape of the LAI system. This enables the inclusion of both spherical and cylindrical shaped LAIs in one model. For initial fractional drug release timepoints (i.e., T=0.25, T=0.5, and T=1.0), where these values were not available from the previously published studies, they were imputed using best fit polynomial curves that range from T = 0 to T = 2 days. The code and results that support the findings of our study are available at the Aspuru-Guzik Group’s GitHub page (https://github.com/aspuru-guzik-group/long-acting-injectables) and in the preprint of the related manuscript available on ChemRxiv (https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2021-mxrxw-v2).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,079
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,145 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetInjection Molding Process and PropertiesTravaux en français237 207