MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4308947540 · doi:10.1002/jbmr.4671

The Second International Workshop on the Evaluation and Management of Hypoparathyroidism

2020· editorial· en· W4308947540 sur OpenAlexaff
Aliya Khan, John P. Bilezikian, Maria Luisa Brandi, B.L. Clarke, John J Potts, Michael Mannstadt

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Bone and Mineral Research · 2020
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesTakeda Pharmaceutical Company
Mots-clésGuidelineMedicineHypoparathyroidismIntensive care medicineEpidemiologySystematic reviewEtiologyMEDLINEInternal medicinePathologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Over the past several years, following publication of the First International Guidelines on Hypoparathyroidism (HypoPT), important advances have occurred in our understanding of the epidemiology, presentation, etiology, complications, and skeletal and renal manifestations of HypoPT.(1) We have also gained global clinical experience with both conventional therapy and the use of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and its analogues in the treatment of HypoPT. Good-quality data with PTH replacement therapy are now becoming available, evaluating both the safety and efficacy of PTH replacement in the management of chronic HypoPT. With the development of new, long-acting molecules capable of mimicking key aspects of endogenous PTH secretion, improvements in care are being achieved. Considering these significant advances in knowledge and clinical experience, new evidence-based guidelines have been developed to provide direction and to define best practice in the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of HypoPT today. An international task force was formed consisting of 50 international experts in HypoPT, as well as general endocrinologists from 15 different countries. Task force members met over the past 2 years and addressed key questions pertaining to the diagnosis, prevention, evaluation, and management of HypoPT. Professor Gordon Guyatt supported the development of the evidence-based guidelines and served as the guideline methodologist with his PhD student Liang Yao. Four systematic reviews and meta-analyses were completed using the GRADE methodology, addressing the complications and management of chronic HypoPT.(2-4) In addition, narrative reviews were completed regarding the epidemiology, financial burden, and etiology of HypoPT.(5, 6) The diagnosis and risk factors for the development of postsurgical HypoPT were reviewed. Strategies to minimize the risk of postsurgical HypoPT are presented.(6) The role of genetic testing in determining the underlying etiology of the HypoPT has been highlighted, as well as an approach to establishing the underlying diagnosis.(7) The ideal monitoring strategies for patient important outcomes were evaluated,(8) as well as the utility of PTH and calcium measurements after total thyroidectomy in predicting the development of chronic HypoPT.(7) Calcium homeostasis in pregnancy and lactation is reviewed with proposed strategies to optimize maternal and fetal outcomes.(9) The risks and benefits of PTH replacement therapy in comparison to conventional therapy have been evaluated with application of the GRADE methodology.(9) Our findings and results of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as the graded and ungraded recommendations were presented to representatives of the international endocrine societies in two separate meetings. The recommendations from the international society representatives were also incorporated into the manuscripts whenever possible. A practice survey determining the optimal monitoring strategy for HypoPT was developed and led by Stan Van Uum and is published as an article in this series.(8) The systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted are also being published as separate articles along with a paper dedicated to describing the methodology of the entire guideline process for both HypoPT as well as primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT).(2-4) The PHPT summary statement and guidelines as well as the articles describing the advances in PHPT are being published in a consecutive issue of JBMR.(10) The summary statement and the guidelines for the evaluation and management of HypoPT provide an overview of the key advances in our knowledge and understanding of HypoPT, as well as the evaluation and management recommendations (both graded and ungraded) for HypoPT.(11) We have also identified a research agenda for each of the four subsections addressed by the four HypoPT task forces. We gratefully acknowledge the major efforts of all the task force members who have been working diligently with us over the past 2 years in developing these articles and recommendations. HypoPT task force members: Dalal S Ali, S Bjornsdottir, Luisella Cianferotti, Michael T Collins, Serge Cremers, Karel Dandurand, David Dempster, Seiji Fukumoto, Rachel Gafni, Ravinder Goswami, Francesca Guisti, Z Hassan-Smith, Pascal Houiller, S Ing, E Helen Kemp, Christian Koch, Michael A Levine, DM Mitchell, Deborah Murphy, Iman M'Hiri, Jesse D Pasternak, Nancy Perrier, Kelly Roszko, Mishaela Rubin, Robert Sanders, Jad Sfeir, Muhammed Shrayyef, Heide Siggelkow, T Sikjaer, Antonio Sitges-Serra, Yu-Kwang Donovan Tay, Rajesh Thakker, Gaia Tobacco, L Underbjerg, Stan Van Umm, Kelly Wentworth, Karen Winer, Weibo Xia, Liam Yao, and Caitlin T Yeo. We also greatly appreciate the feedback and endorsement provided by the 65 scientific international and national societies, and plan on updating the guidelines as new knowledge becomes available over the next several years.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,318
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,708

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,099
Tête enseignante GPT0,415
Écart entre enseignants0,316 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations9
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Bone and Mineral ResearchMême sujetThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryTravaux en français237 207