Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Citation (2022), "Index", Schneider, S., Preiss, P.V. and Marsden, T. (Ed.) Food and Agriculture in Urbanized Societies (Research in Rural Sociology and Development, Vol. 26), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1057-192220220000026015 Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited Copyright © 2023 Sergio Schneider, Potira V. Preiss and Terry Marsden. Published under exclusive licence by Emerald Publishing Limited INDEX Aboca benefit corporation, 74–78 and biodiversity, 76–77 and SDGs, 77–78 Activism, 137 African pathway, 116–122 comparative country figures, 117 comparison of food and core inflation rates in South Africa compared to Ghana and Tanzania, 119 comparison of informal employment and unemployment, 118 African Union Development Agency (AUDA), 113–114 African Union inter-ministerial committee, 113–114 Agrarian citizenship, metabolic rifts and, 46–48 Agri-food capitalism, 11–12 Agri-food corporations, 61 Agri-food disruption and emerging transitions, responses and resistances to, 37–40 Agri-food production, 10 Agri-food sector, 72–74 Agri-food systems, 12–13, 130 public policy and multi-criteria nature of, 9–11 Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR), 50, 52–53 Agriculture, 153 Agriculture and Agro-Processing Master Plan (AAMP), 114 Agro-biodiversity, 76–77 Agro-ecological techniques, 163–164 Agroecological/organic farmers’ markets, 135 Agroecology, 156 Alliance for Healthy and Adequate Food, 141 Alternative food networks, 89 Aspirational food sovereignty, 47 Austerity, 26 Benefit Corporation (B Corp), 72 movement, 71 rise of, 71–72 Benefit Impact Assessment (BIA), 71 Bi-polar spatial model of farming practices , 40 Bio-physical matrix, 38 Biodiversity Aboca and, 76–77 of varieties, 76–77 Biodiversity Strategy for 2030’, 73 Black capitalist farmers, 121 Brazilian Forum on Food and Nutrition Sovereignty and Security (FBSSAN), 139 Brazilian regions, 93 Brazilian traditional food markets, 93–96 Brexit, 36–37 process, 28 British EU Brexit referendum of 2016, 27 Business in sustainable development Aboca and biodiversity, 76–77 Aboca and SDGs, 77–78 agri-food sector, 72–74 B Corp movement, 71 case study, 74–78 from CSR to benefit corporation, 68–69 ESG framework, 70–71 rise of benefit corporations, 71–72 shared value, 69–70 UN sustainable development goals, 71 Campina Grande markets, 95 Campina Grande street markets, 94 Canadian context, 5 Caruaru street markets, 95 Centro Agroecológico Rosario (CAR), 163–164 Centro de Producciones Agroecológicas Rosario (CEPAR), 157–159 Cheshire Cheese, 39 Cheshire Plain, 39 Chicken, case of, 32–34 Civil society as co-manager of public policies, 142–145 organisations, 133 in sustainable food systems, 5 Codes of conduct, 68–69 Colonial agriculture, 96 Committee on World Food Security (CFS), 143–144 Community, 114–115 Conservation of agro-biodiversity, 76–77 Conservatism, 30 Consumerism, food and politics of modern, 17–19 Consumers, 14 Continued financialised oligopolisation, 32–34 trends matter, 34 Conventional markets, 134–135 Cooperativa Ecológica Coolmeia, 132–133 Coronavirus Damage Prevention Plan, 135 Corporate and environmental regime, 24 Corporate food regime , responsibility and, 55 actors, 61 and drivers of pandemics, 59–60 and exacerbating effects, 60–61 risk and (ir)responsibility in, 57–59 Corporate social responsibility (CSR), 67–68 from CSR to benefit corporation, 68–69 Council of Ecological Farmers Markets (CFE), 135 COVID-19, 36–37 emergence of, 61 outbreaks, 60 pandemic, 59 Creating shared Value (CSV), 69–70 Cultural informality, between public regulation and, 96–100 Culturally-Relevant Urban Wellness Program (CRUW Program), 54 De-politicisation, 29 De-regulatory reformism, 28 Decision making process, 4 Decolonisation, 55 Democracy, 138 Democratic Anthropocene, 25 Development model, 152 Disaster Management Act, 111 Disruptive governance, 25, 28–29 Dominant economics, 13–14 Double burden of malnutrition, 3 Ecological Farmers’ Market (FAE), 136 Economic liberalism, 30 Economically liberalist cultural system, 31 Ecosystems, 10 and soil biodiversity, 76–77 Embeddedness, 89 England Cheshire and North Shropshire, England, 39–40 regional cases of, 37–40 Entitlement, 14 Environmental, social and governance (ESG), 70 analysis, 71 framework, 70–71 Environmental dimension, 92 Environmental health practitioners (EHPs), 35 European Commission, 70 European context, 91 European Green Deal, 73 Export Health Certificates (EHCs), 35 Fabianism, 30 Farm to Fork’ strategy designs, 73 Farm workers, 111 Farmer marketers, 94 Farmers markets, 89, 92 Farming as food system, policy tends to outdated view of, 15–17 Farmland Defence League of BC, 52 Farmsecure , 110 Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, 3 Feira Central of Campina Grande, 93, 97–98 Feira de Caruaru , 94 Feira do Pequeno Produtor , 94 in Passo Fundo, 96, 98 Feira dos Agricultores Ecológicos (FAE), 132–133 Fernando Henrique Cardoso (FHC), 139 Fighting Pesticides Day, 133 Financial institutions, 70–71 Financialisation, 33 Fish in Tanzania, 119 Fisherpersons and Artisanal Fishers Movement (MPP), 139–140 Food & Agriculture Organisation (FAO), 11 report, 1 Voluntary Guidelines, 57 Food, 3–4 big data, 13–14 businesses, 35 governance mechanisms, 100 insecurity in South Africa, 118 movements, 61–62 policy, 9 and politics of modern consumerism, 17–19 production, 1–2 progress, 10–11 regime analysis, 56–57 role of state in, 7–9 rural-urban relations and governance of, 85–87 Food Acquisition Program (PAA), 131 Food and nutrition security (FNS), 133 Food markets, 88–89, 115 towards institutional approach on governance of, 88–90 Food security, 111–112, 153 and sustainability, 90 Food sovereignty, 156–157 corporate food regime and drivers of pandemics, 59–60 corporate food regime and exacerbating effects, 60–61 locating responsibility in, 46–48 metro Vancouver’s urban agrarians, 49–50 reciprocity, responsibility and indigenous food sovereignty, 53–55 relational corporate responsibility, 59 responsibilities to mobilise beyond Metro Vancouver, 52–53 responsibility and corporate food regime, 55 responsibility to mobilise for land in Richmond, 51–52 responsibility to mobilise for land in Vancouver, 50–51 rethinking ‘risk and responsibility’, 56–57 risk and (ir)responsibility in corporate food regime, 57–59 two illustrations of responsibility and, 48 urban agrarianism as responsibility, 48–49 Food Standard Agency (FSA), 35 Food systems, 46, 120 approach, 109 in Ghana, 117–118 policy tends to outdated view of farming as, 15–17 in Tanzania, 117–118 Food Systems Summit, 4, 130 Foodsheds, 89 Forum for Food Sovereignty (2007), 47 Fostering new rural-urban relationships Brazilian traditional food markets, 93–96 governance matters, 96–100 and governance of food, 85–87 towards institutional approach on governance of food markets, 88–90 traditional food markets foster, 90–93 Foundational economy, 8–9 Front-line public sector bodies, 35 Fruits, 3 Futuregrowth Investment Fund , 110 Gated housing ‘communities’, 8–9 Geografia da fome , 136 Geopolitica da fome , 136 Global agri-food systems, 5–6 Global food sovereignty movement, 5, 47 Global food system, 1–2 Global Footprint Network, 11 Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), 68–69 Global South, 91 Global Syndemic, 3 Globalised climate regime, 26 Governance, 84, 86–87, 90, 143 of food, rural-urban relations and, 85–87 of food markets, towards institutional approach on, 88–90 mechanisms, bargain, price, quality and variety as institutions and, 93–96 mechanisms, 96 Green Deal’ development, 29 Green Revolution, 137 Greenhouse gas emissions (GHG emissions), 11 GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards), 68–69 Gross domestic product (GDP), 19 Health Care Reform Movement, 137–138 Health food systems, 12 High-Level Panel of Experts on Food and Nutrition Security (HLPE), 143 Hot’ meats, 95 Huerta Parks (HP), 160 Human and Agro-ecological Rural Development (DRHA), 158 Humanity, 11–12 Hunger, 130, 136 Hunger Map, 138–140 Hydro-development project, 52 In land-based communities, 54 Income-generating practises for gardening families, 163–164 Indigenous communities, 54 Indigenous Health Research and Education Garden, 54 Indigenous ontologies, 54 Indigenous sovereignty, 54 Industrial ‘dark’ kitchens, 16 Industrial agriculture, 2–3 Informal markets, 91 Informal sector food selling, 111 workers, 114–115 Instituto de Sociología y Estudios Campesinos (ISEC), 158 Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC), 155–156 Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), 157–158 Integrated Development Plan and Spatial Development Framework, 115 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2 International Covenant on Economic and Social Rights, 57 International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), 143 Johannesburg, traders’ organisations, 120 Johannesburg Fresh Produce Market (JFPM), 112–113 Johannesburg Municipality, 112 Just-in-time food distribution systems, 14 Keynesianism, 30 La Vía Campesina (LVC), 47 Laisser-faire approach to modernity, 15 Landless Movement, 133 Landless Rural Workers Movement (MST), 139–140 Latin American Consortium of Agroecology and Development (CLADES), 158 Layering of agri-food and rural-urban transitions , 40 Legumes, 3 Local markets, 91, 122 Local/territorial markets, 84 Malnutrition, 130, 136 Management and certification standards, 68–69 Management mechanisms, 96 Manchester group, 8–9 Manufactured risk, 56 Market Drayton, 40 Markets, 84, 97 food economics, 13–14 Metabolic rifts and Agrarian citizenship, 46–48 Metro Vancouver, responsibilities to mobilise, 52–53 Metro vancouver’s urban agrarians, 49–50 Migratory processes, 153–155 Military Dictatorship, 137 Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Industry and Commerce of the Province of Santa Fe (MAGIC), 157–158 Movement of People Affected by Dams (MAB), 139–140 Multi-criteria approach to agri-food systems, 11 Multifunctionality, 74 Municipalidad de Rosario (MR), 155 National Coordination of Joint Rural Black Quilombola Communities (CONAQ), 139–140 National Economic Development and Labour Council, 114 National Food and Nutrition Security System (SISAN), 131 National Food Security Council (CONSEA), 131, 138–139, 142–144 National Health Conference (8th) (1986), 138 National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), 97 National Movement for People’s Sovereignty in Mining (MAM), 139–140 National School Feeding Program (PNAE), 131 Natural Selection, 10 NEDLAC, 114–115 Neo-liberalised governments, 26 New social and institutional articulations, generation of, 161–162 Northeastern markets, 96, 98 Nuts, 3 Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 60–61 Office for National Statistics, 36 Official veterinarian (OV), 35 Operation clean sweep, 112 Organic farming techniques, 73, 75 Organic production method, 76 Organized irresponsibility, 56 Pandemics, corporate food regime and drivers of, 59–60 Parallel Government, 138 Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry (CPI), 138 Peasant Women’s Movement (MMC), 139–140 People’s food defence , 14 People’s Summit, 131 Peri-urban Agriculture, 153 Planet Food Earth, 12 Policy-makers intelligent, 10–11 Political cultures, 29–32 Post-Brexit UK government, 31 Potatoes, case of, 32–34 Private sector professionals, 35 Pro bono publico public policy, 11 Pro-Huerta, 157–158 Programa de Distribuição Emergencial de Alimentos (PRODEA), 142 Public authorities justification, 98 Public food policies difficulty, 11–14 food and politics of modern consumerism, 17–19 and multi-criteria nature of agri-food systems, 9–11 policy tends to outdated view of farming as food system, 15–17 role of state in food, 7–9 Public markets, 111 Public policy beneficiaries of, 161–162 and multi-criteria nature of agri-food systems, 9–11 Public regulation, between cultural informality and, 96–100 Qualitative research, 119 Quality, 95 Reflexive learning process, 86–87 Regimes, 24 approach, 24 Region, 38 Regionalised food regimes, 37–38 Regulatory disruption, key areas of, 35–37 Relational corporate responsibility, 59 Relational responsibility, 59 Reporting standards, 68–69 Richmond, responsibility to mobilise for land in, 51–52 Richmond Zoning Amendment Bylaw 9965, 52 Right to Food, 57–58, 136 Rio Grande do Sul (RS), 132–133 Risk arbitrage, 56 Risk society, 56 Rural Youth Pastoral (PJR), 139–140 Rural-urban linkages, 89 Russian invasion of Ukraine, 13 Scale jumping, 52–53 Shared value creation, 69–70 Short supply chains, 87 Short-food supply chains, 89 Small Farmers Movement (MPA), 139–140 Social inclusion, 152 Social institutions, 84–85, 93, 96 Social liberalism, 30 Social metabolism, 59 Social movements, 130 Socio-natural resources, 25–26 South Africa after COVID-19 African pathway, 116–122 April Prices of Fresh Produce, 113 crisis of South Africa’s food system, 108–115 South Africa’s food system, 121 crisis of, 108–115 Southern farmers market of Passo Fundo, 94 Stakeholder consultation, 114 Standing Committees (SCs), 142 Street markets, 97 Street traders, 112–113, 115–116 Street trading, 116 Sub-Saharan Africa, 109 Supermarketisation process, 87 Sustainability, 74 report, 68–69 Sustainable agri-food transformations, 23–25 Sustainable agri-food transitions, 29–32 Sustainable food systems, 47, 84, 89 action of civil society in promoting human right to healthy and adequate food, 136–141 civil society as co-manager of public policies, 142–145 lessons learned and future challenges, 145–146 new markets, 132–136 Sustainable intensification, 40 Technical acceleration, 12–13 Territorial food markets, 89 Third International Conference on Agriculture and Food in an Urbanized Society, 3 Traditional food markets, 84–85 foster new rural-urban relations, 90–93 Traditional markets, 87, 89, 91–92 Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), 53 Tu’wusht Garden Project, 54 Twenty-first-century agri-food system, 16–17 UK consumers, 18 UK food policy, 34 Ultra-processed foods, 16 UN Environment Programme (UNEP), 15 United Nations (UN), 113–114, 144 2030 Agenda, 71 Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples, 52–53 Framework Convention on Climate Change, 19 Secretary General, 4 Special Rapporteurs, 13 United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 164 United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 137 United Nations Food System Summit (UNFSS), 113–114 United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), 17 United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 17, 70–71, 73 Aboca and, 77–78 SDG 12, 77 SDG 15, 77 SDG 3, 77 University of British Columbia (UBC), 50–51, 54 Urban agrarianism, 49 as responsibility, 48–49 Urban agrarians, 48 Urban agriculture (UA), 51–52, 153 agro-ecological interpretation, 156–165 city of Rosario, Argentina as context, 153, 155 environmental services, 164–165 objectives, 153 Urban Agriculture Network of Latin American Research (AGUILA), 154 Urban Agriculture Program (PAU), 158–159 Urban Agriculture Programme (UAP), 165 achievements, 165 territorial reach, 165 Urban bias, 48–49 Vancouver, responsibility to mobilise for land in, 50–51 Vancouver Urban Farming Society, 49–50 Vegetables, 3 Vegetal biodiversity, 76–77 Via Campesina, 139–140 Wales regional cases of, 37–40 South West Wales, 37–39 Welsh Government, 36 West’s model of agri-food progress, 12 Wet markets. (see Public markets) Working Group on Indigenous Food Sovereignty (WGIFS), 53 World Association for Fighting Hunger, 137 World Food Day, 133 World Food Program (WFP), 143 World Health Organisation (WHO), 9–10 World Trade Organization, 56–57 Worsening food insecurity (WFP), 11–12 Book Chapters Prelims Challenges and Perspectives for Food and Agriculture in Urbanized Societies in the 21st Century: An Introduction Public Food Policies in Difficult Times: Consumers and the State Sustainable Agri-Food Transformations and the Rise of Disruptive Governance Responsibility for Food Sovereignty in an Urbanizing and Risky World The Role of Business in Sustainable Development: Becoming Benefit Corporations in the Agri-Food Sector Fostering New Rural-Urban Relationships Through Markets, and the Key Role of Governance South Africa After COVID-19: Identifying the Overlooked Economic Actors Needed for a Just and Equitable Food System The Role of Civil Society in Sustainable Food Systems: Insights From the Brazilian Experience Urban Agriculture as a Way to Address Social Inequalities From an Agroecological Approach, at Rosario, Santa Fé, Argentina Index
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,390 | 0,018 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».