Cooperative Process to Draw Up a Portrait of the Initial Training Path for Nurses in Quebec and Identify Possibilities in the Area of Cultural Safety Among First Nations and Inuit
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: In recent years, several provincial and national reports have highlighted the need for more cultural safety education for health care professionals to ensure safe equitable care for Indigenous people. In the province of Quebec, the death of Joyce Echaquan has been a key lever for diverse health organizations and teaching institutions in order to take concrete actions against health inequities and systemic racism experienced by Indigenous people within the health care system. In response, the Order of Nurses of Quebec officially recognized the existence of systemic racism within the health care system and initiated actions to promote cultural safety and to engage against systemic racism within the nursing profession. Among the actions, the Order of Nurses of Quebec mandated a working group to address an advisory to evaluate if the entry-to-practice nursing education in Quebec was sufficient to provide culturally safe, relevant, and equitable care to Indigenous individuals. We are the authors who carried out the collaborative process leading to the advisory. From this collaborative process, we believe that our approach, our findings and our reflections are relevant to share with those who are involved in nursing education in Quebec and Canada. Objective: This discussion paper aim to describe the collaborative process leading to the advisory which was divided into four iterative stages: 1) a narrative literature review, 2) a short online survey, 3) discussions sessions, and 4) consultations. It also aims to discuss the main findings and reflections regarding the cultural safety competencies in initial nursing education in Quebec. Discussion and Reflections: We believe that our collaborative process was a strength of the main findings and reflections that are described in this discussion paper. The results of the survey showed that Indigenous cultural safety content and time allocation was insufficient and varied greatly between teaching institutions in Quebec. No institutions offered electives or specific courses on Indigenous cultural safety; however, cultural safety was addressed in a cross-cutting manner by the majority of institutions. As for the narrative literature review and the discussions sessions, numerous strategies are outlined to guide educators in further developing the Indigenous cultural safety content in their nursing programs. These strategies highlight the need to work with Indigenous communities to decolonize and indigenize the nursing profession and education and the need to focus on faculty development including, hiring Indigenous nurses. Conclusion: Within our collaborative process, we consider that we have succeeded in bridging together reflections to support teachers and professors in Quebec and Canada to develop and integrate Indigenous cultural safety content in nursing programs. We also agree that is necessary for all Canadian provinces to initiate a reflection about Indigenous cultural safety in entry-to-practice nursing programs in order to ensure culturally safe, relevant, and equitable care to Indigenous individuals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,017 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,030 | 0,012 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».