Doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-induced hypertriglyceridemia in a newly diagnosed AIDS patient
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 44-year-old woman (male-to-female) affected by hypertension and asthma with history of unprotected sexual intercourse and inhalatory drug abuse was admitted to the emergency room complaining of nausea, headache, and convulsive status epilepticus. Brain computed tomography (CT) scan showed hypodense lesions in the left parietal lobe and left cerebellar hemisphere, compatible with a central nervous system opportunistic infection. Fourth-generation HIV test was positive and further confirmed by immunoblotting (baseline absolute lymphocyte count 1256 cell/μl; CD3+CD4+ count 52 cells/μl; CD4+/CD8+ ratio 0.06 with HIV-1-RNA: 407 000 copies/ml). Intravenous valproic acid, levetiracetam and lacosamide were started as antiepileptic therapy. Furthermore, intravenous mannitol was administered for the reduction of intracranial pressure resulting from cerebral edema. PCR for Toxoplasma spp. tested positive on whole blood sample, and even though cerebrospinal fluid analysis was unfeasible because of compressive phenomena on the left brain fourth ventricle, a diagnosis of neurotoxoplasmosis was made. Several active infections were also diagnosed, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), hepatitis B virus (HBV) (because of the presence of HBs, HBe antigens, HBe antibodies and HBV-DNA 72UI/ml), cytomegalovirus (with detectable viremia) and pulmonary aspergillosis. Active and latent infection because of Mycobacterium tuberculosis was ruled out. Considering the need for prophylactic treatments and the presence of multiple active infections, the patient received secondary prophylaxis for SARS-CoV2 with a single dose of sotrovimab (VIR-7831). Treatment for pulmonary aspergillosis was started with isavuconazole, and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole was introduced for the treatment of neurotoxoplasmosis. Prophylaxis for Mycobacterium avium complex was also provided with oral azithromycin. Antiretroviral treatment (ART) with doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF) association as fixed-dose combination single-tablet regimen (Delstrigo-Merck Canada Inc.) was initiated. Nevertheless, during the following routine blood test, an unexpected increase in triglyceride value was noted, which spiked up to 1719 mg/dl on the 15th day after the introduction of DOR/3TC/TDF. No sign or symptom of acute pancreatitis was detected at any time during hospitalization. A differential diagnosis was made between a previously undiagnosed familial hypertriglyceridemia and drug-related toxicity. A complete lipid profile was performed at admission revealing an isolated mild hypertriglyceridemia (admission triglyceride value 276 mg/dl, reference range <150 mg/dl); therefore, the first diagnostic hypothesis was excluded. In an attempt to identify the drug putatively responsible for the sudden increase in triglyceride levels, therapy was simplified with sequential sampling of blood triglycerides. No improvement was observed after isavuconazole, azithromycin or valproic acid suspension. Considering the whole therapeutic scheme, after a literature search for possible interactions and side effects, we safely assumed hypertriglyceridemia as unrelated side effect of any of the remaining drugs, including levetiracetam, lacosamide and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole [1,2]. This led us to evaluate the possible involvement of DOR/3TC/TDF. Considering the increased risk of acute pancreatitis because of hypertriglyceridemia, plasma apheresis was suggested. Nevertheless, the patient refused the treatment. The simultaneous interruption of DOR/3TC/TDF together with the introduction of gemfibrozil caused a rapid decrease in triglyceride levels (Fig. 1). According to fenofibrate effect on lowering triglyceride levels, reported, on a sample of 1113 patients with a 4 months median follow-up, a median reduction of triglycerides of 60% (P < 0.001) [3]. Conversely, our patient reported a reduction of 87.5% on triglyceride levels in less than 2 weeks, further reinforcing our hypothesis of a drug-induced isolated hypertriglyceridemia.Fig. 1: Serum triglyceride assessment and concomitant treatment regimens.We therefore proceeded with a treatment re-challenge with DOT/3TC/TDF in combination with gemfibrozil, with a new rapid increase in triglyceride levels, implying a direct effect of DOR/3TC/TDF on triglyceride levels: complete normalization after DOR/3TC/TDF suspension in favor of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide was registered. We concluded that hypertriglyceridemia was a consequence of DOR/3TC/TDF administration. Paradoxically, comparative data from the registration trials DRIVE-AHEAD, DRIVE-FORWARD and DRIVE-SHIFT, found it to have, on average, a reducing effect on triglycerides, when compared with other ART regimens [4–6]. Hypertriglyceridemia (500–1000 mg/dl) has been reported among the rare side effects of patients treated with DOR/3TC/TDF (2/336, 0.6% of cases) [4]. Likewise, in the DRIVE-SHIFT-trial, 0.3% of patients showed an increase of triglyceride levels, that is, 1 of 391 in the first 24 weeks, and 1 of 377 in the period 24–48 weeks of treatment [6]. Due to multiple drug co-administration for the first time, no certain causal link can be attributable to the DOR/3TC/TDF alone. Nevertheless, the timing and magnitude of dramatic triglyceride level changes during challenging, suspension and re-challenging, makes it highly suggestive. However, the newly administered fibrate therapy makes the triglyceride response to re-challenge difficult to interpret. Single-tablet regimens, such as DOR/3TC/TDF, favor compliance and are generally well tolerated. When compared with drug regimens containing protease inhibitors, ART including nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTIs) such as doravirine show a significant improvement in triglyceride levels, representing a good therapeutic option in patients with impaired lipid profile [7]. However, in rare cases, DOR/3TC/TDF can be associated with severe hypertriglyceridemia, as shown in our report. Acknowledgements Authors’ contributions and approval of text: B.V. an L.V.R. drafted the manuscript, B.V., L.R., R.I., M.B., and D.S.G. collected clinical and laboratory data and were in charge of the clinical management, A.M., S.L., and M.I. supervised the work and critically revised the manuscript. Conflicts of interest M.I. received honoraria for lectures from Biogen Italia, AIM Educational, MICOM srl, Roche SpA; L.S. reports honoraria for lectures and research grants from Merk, Gilead, Abbvie, Angelini SpA; M.A. reports honoraria for lectures and research grants from Merk, Gilead, Abbvie, Angelini SpA. The other authors declare no competing interests relative to this study.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».