Efficacy, residual effectiveness and safety of diacerein in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the leading cause of disability in the elderly. Prevention and treatment of OA have become an urgent global demand. The pharmacologic role of diacerein in the treatment of osteoarthritis is controversial. We systematically reviewed the efficacy, safety, and residual effectiveness of diacerein. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the symptomatic efficacy, residual effect and safety of diacerein in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, using a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: On December 1, 2021, we searched PubMed Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases, Wan Fang Medical Database, and National Knowledge Infrastructure. This study followed the inclusion criteria of the principle P(Population), I(Intervention), C(Comparison), O(Outcome), S (Study design) principle. All studies were randomized controlled trials of knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. To explore sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, regression analysis and publication bias analysis were performed. Drug side effects with complete data were extracted from the included articles and then a combined analysis of these data was performed. RESULTS: Eight studies were eligible and were included in our analysis (N = 1277 participants). All studies were randomized controlled trials of knee osteoarthritis. There was no significant difference in reduction of joint pain and improvement of function between diacerein and the control group. However, subgroup analysis suggested, compared with the placebo group, diacerein treatment yielded an improved mean reduction in visual analogue scale score of-0.44% (95% confidence interval [CI]-0.79 to 0.09), an improved the western Ontario and McMaster universities (physical function) score of -0.44% (95% CI-0.72 to -0.12). Follow-up analysis after discontinuation showed that diacerein treatment had a significant residual effect (95% CI-0.81 to- 0.24). Data on drug side effects described in the included articles were extracted for statistical analysis. There was an increased risk of diarrhea with diacerein (Risk Ratio [RR] = 1.95 [1.03 to 2.47]) and withdrawal event from therapy (RR = 0.93 [0.75 to 1.15]). CONCLUSION: Diacerein might be considered an effective drug for the treatment of patients with KOA, showing short-term residual effectiveness. Although it is associated with an increased risk of diarrhea, the adverse event is mostly tolerable.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,017 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,050 | 0,008 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».