MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4309811310 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-02271061mtgabs

(Digital Presentation) Application of Polarity Reversal and Performance Analysis of Continuous Electrocoagulation

2022· article· en· W4309811310 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueEconomic and Technological Systems Analysis
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPassivationAnodePolarity reversalElectrolyteCathodeElectrodeMaterials scienceElectrocoagulationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryChemical engineeringLayer (electronics)Composite materialVoltageElectrical engineeringChromatography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

An important challenge for continuous treatment by electrocoagulation (EC) is the passivation and fouling of electrodes which increases during the longer operation (Ingelsson et al., 2020). The application of polarity reversal (PR) and treatment performance of EC was investigated using continuous flow reactor for simultaneous removal of silica and hardness (calcium and magnesium) from produced water. Polarity reversal times (PRT) from 30 s to 10 min were studied at a fixed charge loading of 2000 C L - 1 (i.e., the amount of charge passed per unit volume of produced water treated) using Fe and Al electrodes. Periodic PR was found to reduce the fouling and de-passivate the electrodes by changing the surface chemistry at the electrode-electrolyte interface (Ingelsson et al., 2020; Yasri et al., 2022). During 90 minutes of continuous treatment the chronopotentiometric data indicated that a PRT of 10 min was more effective in reducing the cell voltage for both Fe and Al electrodes [Fig. 1 (a & b)]. With a longer PRT of 10 min, there is more time for the acid boundary layer to form on the anode, which mitigates metal precipitation at the anode. In contrast the higher cell voltage that persists in direct current EC (DC-EC) could be due to the precipitation of Ca and Mg minerals in the alkaline solution on the cathode surface, leading to cathode passivation (Chow et al., 2021). After the first polarity reversal, both electrodes have been anodic, removing passivation layers from the surface and reducing the cell voltage. On reversing the polarity, the cathode becomes the anode, and the acidic pH on the formed at the electrode interface will facilitate the dissolution of Ca and Mg precipitates on the electrode surface, reducing the cell voltage significantly. For Fe-EC, the contaminant removal performance increased with PRT, and the highest removal was observed with DC-EC (Fig. 1c). The increasing removal performance with PRT for Fe-EC is consistent with the increase in faradaic efficiency observed of 55%, 68%, 85%, and 99.8% with 30 sec, 2 min and 10 min PRT, and DC respectively. The lower faradaic efficiencies for Fe-EC with short PRTs are likely due to redox reactions of iron species at the electrode surface (Chow et al. 2021). The contaminant removal at a charge loading of 2000 C L –1 using DC-EC with Al electrodes was similar to that for PR-EC with PRTs of 2 to 10 min (Fig. 1d). Slightly lower Si and hardness removal was observed for Al-EC at the shortest PRT of 30 s. For Al-EC, the faradaic efficiency was also observed to increase with PRT, with values of 150%, 220% and 287% obtained at 30 sec, 2 min and 10 min PRT respectively. The super-faradaic (>100%) efficiencies can be explained by dissolution of the Al from the cathode under the local alkaline conditions that develop on the electrode surface. With a short PRT, there is less time for the alkaline pH to develop at the surface and hence the faradaic efficiency was reduced. References: Chow, H., Ingelsson, M., Roberts, E.P.L., Pham, A.L.T., 2021. How does periodic polarity reversal affect the faradaic efficiency and electrode fouling during iron electrocoagulation? Water Res. 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117497 Ingelsson, M., Yasri, N., Roberts, E.P.L., 2020. Electrode passivation, faradaic efficiency, and performance enhancement strategies in electrocoagulation—a review. Water Res. 187, 116433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116433 Yasri, N.G., Ingelsson, M., Nightingale, M., Jaggi, A., Dejak, M., Kryst, K., Oldenburg, T.B.P., Roberts, E.P.L., 2022. Investigation of electrode passivation during electrocoagulation treatment with aluminum electrodes for high silica content produced water. Water Sci. Technol. 85, 925–942. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.012 Fig. 1. Impact of PR-EC on cell voltage with reversal time of 10 min (a) with Fe-EC and (b) with Al-EC and comparison of the performance of DC-EC and PR-EC for polarity reversal times of 30 sec, 2 min and 10 min of (c) Fe-EC and (d) Al-EC at flowrate 60 mL min -1 corresponds to (Re) = 116, charge loading 2000 C L⁻ 1 and current density 8 mA cm -2 . Figure 1

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,067
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,268

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,202
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle