Stability of IrO<sub>2</sub> Oxygen Evolution Reaction Anode Co-Catalysts Under Transient Operation and Its Effect on PEM Fuel Cell Durability
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Among various degradation phenomena in polymer-electrolyte-membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), cell reversal (CR) occurring due to an under-stoichiometric supply of H2 to the anode is known to cause the irreversible corrosion of the carbon support of carbon-supported platinum (Pt/C) anode catalysts via the carbon oxidation reaction (COR). Several strategies to mitigate the damages of cell reversal have been documented in the literature, from which the addition of an oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalyst (e.g., IrO2) to the anode has attracted great attention. The lower OER onset potential in the presence of IrO2 impedes the increase of the anode potential during cell reversal events, thus reducing the COR rate. A recent study from our group showed that in spite of the high OER activity of an IrO2-based anode co-catalyst, its stability under transient PEMFC operation conditions, e.g., during unmitigated start-up/shut-down (SUSD) events, should be considered for long-term durability (1). The near-surface layer(s) of IrO2 can be completely reduced to metallic Ir upon exposure to H2 under typical operating conditions in a PEMFC anode, leading to Ir dissolution during the anode potential transients associated with SUSD cycles. The diffusion of dissolved Irn+ species through the membrane towards the cathode and its further deposition on the Pt/C catalyst reduces its oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity and results in a significant performance loss during normal PEMFC operation. Since the origin of such degradation mechanism is the chemical reduction of the IrO2 anode co-catalysts in the hydrogen environment of the anode, a reduction-resistant IrO2 would be required for long-term to stabilize such an anode co-catalyst (1). In a recent contribution from our group, we have introduced a novel approach to prepare IrO2 anode co-catalysts that are irreducible (proven by TGA analyses and observed after extended PEMFC operation). In contrast to typically employed IrO2 catalysts (usually prepared by heat treatment of an Ir precursor at T ≈ 400 °C), the stability of these irreducible IrO2 (irr-IrO2) catalysts is highlighted by the application of SUSD transients, where Ir dissolution is drastically reduced, so that no iridium poisoning of the Pt/C cathode catalyst is observed (2). In this work, we investigate the stability of a state-of-the-art IrO2 catalyst and this novel irr-IrO2 catalyst when used as anode co-catalysts, applying two different accelerated stress tests (ASTs): a) SUSD transients + CR cycles (relevant for PEMFC systems); and b) CR cycles only (commonly used as test to evaluate the effectiveness anode co-catalysts). The application of both ASTs allows the separation and comparison of trends in the activity of the OER catalyst (i.e., its ability to mitigate the COR at the anode) and in its stability (i.e., its stability towards Ir dissolution). The later is particularly important when considering the applicability of anode co-catalysts for actual PEMFC applications. References M. Fathi Tovini, A. M. Damjanovic, H. A. El-Sayed, J. Speder, C. Eickes, J.-P. Suchsland, A. Ghielmi, and H. A. Gasteiger, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 168 (6), 064521 (2021). M. Fathi Tovini, A. M. Damjanović, H. A. El-Sayed, F. Friedrich, B. Strehle, J. Speder, A. Ghielmi and H. A. Gasteiger, Abstract: I03-1466 Irreducible IrO2 Anode Co-Catalysts for PEM Fuel Cell Voltage Reversal Mitigation and Their Stability Under Transient Operation Conditions, in 241st Electrochemical Society Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2022).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».