MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4310090098 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7370283

WATCH Live** XVII MENS SOFTBALL WORLD CUP 2022 LIVE FREE WBSC Zealand

2022· article· en· W4310090098 sur OpenAlex
Jay

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueBig Data and Digital Economy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArtTelecommunicationsAdvertisingEngineeringBusiness

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Fans around the world will be able to watch the 50 games of the XVII WBSC Men’s Softball World Cup through the WBSC's exclusive online video platform, GameTime.The top 12 men’s national softball teams in the world will take to the diamond on Saturday, to open the XVII WBSC Men’s Softball World Cup at Rosedale Park in Auckland, New Zealand. A total of 50 games will be played in nine days on the two diamonds at the stunning complex, and each game will be available to watch around the world.\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\nCLICK HERE TO WATCH LIVE FREE\n\t\n\t\n\n\t\nCLICK HERE TO WATCH LIVE FREE\n\t\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\nThis dataset contains impact metrics and indicators for a set of publications that are related to the COVID-19 infectious disease and the coronavirus that causes it. It is based on:gdf\n\n\nThe press conference for the tournament took place on Friday, on the eve of Saturday's start to the tournament. “After the disappointing defeat in the Prague final where we finished in second place, everyone was crying,” Japan head coach Hiroshi Yoshimura said. “It was a heart breaking loss for everyone. Since then, we’ve been working to win, so we’re going to do our best to lift the cup this time.”\n\n“We’re a bit out of season, we play in Canada until August, so that’s always a challenge for us,” said John Stuart, Canada’s head coach. “Our preparation started the first week of September as a team, a lot of communication via Zoom, phone calls, and training program just making sure the guys are prepared.”\n\n“Our goal, the same as all the teams that are here, is to win the title. Then, let’s see what happens, but we’re here to win the championship. Every team here is ready, we all want to win,” said Venezuela’s Luis Russo.\n\nCheck all the head coaches' quotes and team profiles here.\n\nWhere To Watch\n\nA total of 50 games will be played in nine days and all of them will be available to watch around the world.\n\nIn the New Zealand territory, indigenous broadcaster Whakaata Māori will livestream all games of the tournament on its digital platform MĀORI+, with all the games of New Zealand Black Sox broadcasted live on free-to-air television. Whakaata Māori (formerly known as Māori Television) is the official broadcaster of the XVII WBSC Men’s Softball World Cup.\n\n\nΤhe CORD-19 dataset released by the team of Semantic Scholar1 anddg\nΤhe curated data provided by the LitCovid hub2.gd\n\n\nThese data have been cleaned and integrated with data from COVID-19-TweetIDs and from other sources (e.g., PMC). The result was dataset of 500,314 unique articles along with relevant metadata (e.g., the underlying citation network). We utilized this dataset to produce, for each article, the values of the following impact measures:\n\n\nInfluence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact of an article. This is based on the PageRank3 network analysis method. In the context of citation networks, it estimates the importance of each article based on its centrality in the whole network. This measure was calculated using the PaperRanking (https://github.com/diwis/PaperRanking) library4.\nInfluence_alt: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact of a\n\n\nThese data have been cleaned and integrated with data from COVID-19-TweetIDs and from other sources (e.g., PMC). The result was dataset of 500,314 unique articles along with relevant metadata (e.g., the underlying citation network). We utilized this dataset to produce, for each article, the values of the following impact measures:sdgfdh\n\n\nInfluence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact of an article. This is based on the PageRank3 network analysis method. In the context of citation networks, it estimates the importance of each article based on its centrality in the whole network. This measure was calculated using the PaperRanking (https://github.com/diwis/PaperRanking) library4.sdgd\nInfluence_alt: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact of an article. This is the Citation Count of each article, calculated based on the citation network between the articles contained in the BIP4COVID19 dataset.sdgf\n\n\nsafs    Popularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact of an article. This is based on the AttRank5 citation network analysis method. Methods like PageRank are biased against recently published articles (new articles need time to receive their first citations). AttRank alleviates this problem incorporating an attention-based mechanism, akin to a time-restricted version of preferential attachment, to explicitly capture a researcher's preference to read papers which received a lot of attention recently. This is why it is more suitable to capture the current "hype" of an article.asdsg\n\n\nsf    Popularity alternative: An alternative citation-based measure reflecting the current impact of an article (this was the basic popularity measured provided by BIP4COVID19 until version 26). This is based on the RAM6 citation network analysis method. Methods like PageRank are biased against recently published articles (new articles need time to receive their first citations). RAM alleviates this problem using an approach known as "time-awareness". This is why it is more suitable to capture the current "hype" of an article. This measure was calculated using the PaperRanking (https://github.com/diwis/PaperRanking) library4.sfb\nSocial Media Attention: The number of tweets related to this article. Relevant data were collected from the COVID-19-TweetIDs dataset. In this version, tweets between 23/6/22-29/6/22 have been considered from the previous dataset.\n\n\nWe provide five CSV files, all containing the same information, however each having its entries ordered by a different impact measure. All CSV files are tab separated and have the same columns (PubMed_id, PMC_id, DOI, influence_score, popularity_alt_score, popularity score, influence_alt score, tweets count).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Science ouverte, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,860
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,000
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0040,010
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,012

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,188 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle