A Phase 3 Study of Tafasitamab Plus Lenalidomide in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (firmMIND)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive form of lymphoma and the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma representing ~31% of all cases (Thandra KC, et al. Med Sci. 2021;9:5). Treatment with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone is the standard first-line therapy; however, 30-40% of patients experience relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease (Harris LJ, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:8553). High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improve outcomes for patients with R/R disease; however, many patients are ineligible for HDC/ASCT owing to age, comorbidities, or frailty. Therapies targeting CD19, which is expressed on normal and malignant B cells and regulates proliferation, have also shown promising results in the treatment of R/R DLBCL. Tafasitamab is a humanized mAb targeting CD19, and Fc-engineered for increased affinity to Fcγ receptors on immune effector cells. Preclinical data showed that tafasitamab acts synergistically with the immune modulator lenalidomide. The phase 2 L-MIND study (NCT02399085) evaluated tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in patients with R/R DLBCL who were ineligible for HDC/ASCT. The objective response rate (ORR) was 57.5% (n=46/80), including a complete response in 40.0% (n=32/80) of patients. Responses were durable, with a median duration of response of 43.9 months at ≥35 months of median follow-up. Based on the results of L-MIND, tafasitamab plus lenalidomide was approved in the United States (accelerated approval), Canada and European Union (conditional approval), and other countries for adult patients with R/R DLBCL who are not eligible for ASCT. The firmMIND study (NCT05429268) is a post-authorization commitment study to confirm the efficacy, safety, and overall benefit/risk of the combination of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in R/R DLBCL. Study Design and Methods: In this single-arm, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 study, patients will receive tafasitamab (12 mg/kg IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle [cycles 1-3] with an additional loading dose on cycle 1 day 4, then days 1 and 15 [cycles 4-12]) plus lenalidomide (25 mg orally once daily, days 1-21/cycle) for 12 cycles, followed by tafasitamab monotherapy (in patients with stable disease or better) until progressive disease, withdrawal of consent, or unacceptable toxicity. Radiologic assessments will be performed at baseline, cycles 3, 5, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, and then every 12 months until end of treatment (EOT). Positron emission tomography will be performed at baseline and then throughout treatment to EOT. Eligible patients are ≥18 years of age with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of DLBCL, T-cell/histiocyte-rich large BCL, Epstein-Barr virus-positive DLBCL of the elderly, grade 3b follicular lymphoma, composite lymphoma with a DLBCL component and subsequent DLBCL relapse, or histological transformation of a low-grade lymphoma into DLBCL. Patients must have measurable R/R disease; received at least 1 but no more than 3 previous systemic regimens for DLBCL, one of which must have been an anti-CD20-targeted therapy; be ineligible for intensive salvage therapy including ASCT; ECOG performance status of 0-2; and adequate organ function. Patients with any other lymphoid neoplasm including primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, DLBCL with simultaneous MYC2, BCL2, and/or BCL6 translocations, or prior central nervous system lymphoma, prior treatment with CD19-targeted therapy or an immunomodulator, ASCT ≤3 months before study start, primary refractory DLBCL (disease progressing <6 months of first-line treatment), or prior allogenic stem cell transplantation are excluded. The primary endpoint is ORR assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) based on the Lugano criteria (Cheson BD, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3059-3068). Secondary endpoints include safety, IRC-assessed progression-free survival, and overall survival. It is planned to enroll 81 patients into the study.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».