MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4310399219 · doi:10.1097/phh.0000000000001676

PH WINS: Necessary, Actionable Public Health Workforce Data at a Pivotal Moment for the Field

2022· editorial· en· W4310399219 sur OpenAlexaff
Rachel Hare Bork, Brian C. Castrucci, Michael R. Fraser

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Public Health Management and Practice · 2022
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiquePublic Health Policies and Education
Établissements canadiensFraser Health
Organismes subventionnairesde Beaumont Foundation
Mots-clésWorkforcePublic healthPublic relationsWorkforce planningBusinessWorkforce developmentPolitical scienceEconomic growthMedicineNursingEconomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Public health practice is experiencing immense change driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, along with increasing recognition of how social, cultural, and political forces impact community health and resilience. For the governmental public health workforce, which has long been underfunded, the American Rescue Plan promises an increase of federal funds to address workforce challenges and improve the nation's governmental public health infrastructure.1 This influx of funds creates new flexibility and a rare opportunity for state and local governmental public health agencies to “dream big.” New data from the 2021 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS) capture the perceptions and experiences of the governmental public health workforce and provide a unique road map for strengthening and modernizing our public health agencies. These data can help ensure that those “dreams” target the most pressing workforce needs and can measure progress toward fortifying a system critical to maintaining and improving the public's health. As the Workforce Has Changed, So Has PH WINS Since its inception, PH WINS has evolved to reflect changing roles and perceptions of governmental public health employees. In 2013, the de Beaumont Foundation and the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) first convened the National Consortium for Public Health Workforce Development, leading to the report Building Skills for a More Strategic Public Health Workforce: A Call to Action.2 One recommendation called for a mechanism to assess training needs and help the workforce plan for succession, boost recruitment and retention, and position the workforce for success. At the time, individual state and local public health agencies and membership societies were fielding employee surveys that used different instruments with inconsistent sampling strategies, making valid comparisons impossible. The national surveys that existed primarily captured administrative data at the organizational level. PH WINS was created to provide data that previously had not been consistently collected nationally. With the partnership of ASTHO and the help of workforce champions in the participating agencies, there were 23 000 responses collected in the inaugural fielding of PH WINS in 2014, with more than half of states and a few local health departments (LHDs) participating. In 2017, the number of responses more than doubled (47 000) and included 47 states and the first ever nationally representative sample of the workforce in local governmental public health agencies.3 What resulted was a national benchmark against which LHDs could measure their workforce, which did not exist previously. Furthermore, survey organizers expanded the training needs questions and highlighted responses by supervisory status, leading to more actionable findings. PH WINS continued to expand in 2021 with a new pilot program, PH WINS for All, that included all governmental public health agencies in HRSA Regions 5 and 10, yielding useful insights into LHDs. New questions about health equity and racism sought to build on 2017 data, which showed that while the importance of addressing social determinants of health (SDOH) was widely recognized, there was not broad consensus about who should be involved in such efforts and low self-reported competence and confidence in these areas.4 Following Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) April 2021 declaration of racism as “a serious public health threat”5 and several jurisdictions naming racism as a public health crisis, survey questions about health equity and racism also demonstrated how well health departments were equipped to address racism and move from declaration to action. The pandemic's toll on the governmental public health workforce was another area of focus in 2021. Previous survey questions about stress and burnout as components of mental health were updated to reflect observations from the field; new questions about bullying and harassment were also added. As the world and the workforce continue to evolve, PH WINS data will provide an important through line, as the only survey that longitudinally captures the individual perspectives of the state and local governmental public health workforce. While uniting and aligning stakeholders can be difficult, PH WINS 2021 represents a partnership across numerous public health entities, which has been and will remain essential to its success. In This Supplement, Analyses of Timely Public Health Topics Provide Tools for Improvement The state and local governmental public health workforce stepped up to respond to COVID-19, and the fallout from that shift in focus is starting to emerge. In “The Opportunity Cost of COVID for Public Health Practice: COVID-19 Pandemic Response Work and Lost Foundational Areas of Public Health Work,” McCullough and Robins explore what was lost with so much of the workforce diverted to pandemic response. For example, with more than 90% of the communicable disease workforce focused on COVID-19, diseases such as HIV/AIDS, influenza, and hepatitis were deprioritized, and vaccination schedules were disrupted at a time when polio and measles are growing threats. Yeager, Madsen, and Schaffer take a more personal look at the pandemic response in “Qualitative Insights From Governmental Public Health Employees About Experiences Serving During the COVID-19 Pandemic, PH WINS 2021.” They identified the relationship between leadership and employees as a particular challenge during the pandemic, with breakdowns in communication that resulted in employees feeling undervalued and unappreciated. Nevertheless, public health workers remain committed to their jobs, taking pride in their work and seeking to collaborate with colleagues. In “Awareness of and Confidence to Address Equity-Related Concepts Across the Governmental Public Health Workforce: Findings From the 2021 Administration of PH WINS,” Porter et al examine the workforce's awareness and confidence in addressing health equity, SDOH, and social determinants of equity (SDOE). While generally aware of these concepts, employees lack the confidence to address them in their work. Gaining insight into which areas the workforce has or lacks confidence enables decision makers to develop a plan to address these shortcomings. Taken together, the 2021 PH WINS data and the analyses in this supplement provide needed data to jump-start the workforce planning and changes necessary to prepare state and local public health agencies to safeguard the nation's safety, security, and economic prosperity. These data offer not only a snapshot of what the public health workforce has experienced and felt but also the critical information that can be used to advocate for state and local governmental public health agencies and their employees, including the need for programs and training addressing health equity, anti-racism, SDOH, and SDOE. These findings bolster anecdotal observations with robust data about recruitment and retention, burnout, and other issues facing the public health workforce—including qualitative data that humanize their experience and help tell their story. This supplement should serve as the road map for the workforce improvement efforts that we most need. The availability of these data is timely as CDC prepares to release the awards from its recent Strengthening U.S. Public Health Infrastructure, Workforce, and Data Systems grant.6 As you read through the supplement and explore the data, we encourage you to consider how you can use them in your own work. Funding to support PH WINS is secured for 2024 and 2027. In future iterations of PH WINS, we will be able to evaluate the nation's collective efforts to improve the public health workforce and, in doing so, the health of the nation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,067
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesMétarecherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,441
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0670,020
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,000
Communication savante0,0000,003
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,274
Tête enseignante GPT0,535
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Public Health Management and PracticeMême sujetPublic Health Policies and EducationTravaux en français237 207