CO2 Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Policy Trends in the European Union (EU) and Major European Countries
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
According to the 1st Working Group (WG) report of the 6th Assessment Report (AR 6) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published on August 9, 2021, the average global temperature is now higher than before industrialization. It has already risen 1.09〬 C, and the average carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere is 410ppm, the highest level in 2 million years. If carbon emissions continue according to the current trend, it is highly likely that the temperature rise limit target according to the Paris Agreement and the threshold of an irreversible climate catastrophe will reach 1.5〬 C within 20 years at the most. With such a prospect, it is not enough to emphasize the importance of technology development to reduce greenhouse gas, which threatens the survival of mankind. Carbon Dioxide Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) technology, which is a representative technology for large-scale reduction of greenhouse gas, which is the main cause of global warming, has recently attracted attention. The national vision of achieving carbon neutrality in 2050 is closely related to the implementation of the Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under Articles 3 and 4 of the Paris Agreement. Carbon dioxide capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) technology is a representative technology for large-scale reduction of greenhouse gases closely related to achieving carbon neutrality in 2050. In order to increase the effectiveness of Korean CCUS technology, it is important to consider overseas advanced CCUS policies. Accordingly, in this report, examples of carbon dioxide capture, transport, utilization and storage (CCUS) projects that can be seen as part of the Green New Deal policies of the European Union (EU) and major European countries and carbon dioxide in major European countries such as Germany, Norway and the United Kingdom Recent policy trends on capture, transport, utilization and storage (CCUS) are reviewed. Through this, first, CCUS is an important means to achieve 2050 carbon growth by supplementing the problems of new and renewable energy such as intermittent, inefficiency, and noise pollution. Because it is important, regular and occasional disclosure of information to residents and enhancement of public acceptance through resident meetings and seminars are very important. Third, the United States, Canada and China are CCUS powerhouses as well as major European countries such as Germany, Norway, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. As above mentioned CCUS powerhouses are spurring CCUS research and development, if Korea neglects research and development on CCUS, it will fall into a technology-dependent country. Through this, implications such as that Korea should achieve the carbon-neutral 2050 target and achieve sustainable development were derived.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».