Cementless <scp>Porous‐Coated</scp> Metaphyseal Sleeves Used for Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Short‐ to Mid‐Term Outcomes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: While many studies have presented excellent short-term outcomes of the metaphyseal sleeves used in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), currently published mid-term results remain limited and some controversial issues remain unresolved. The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical and radiographic mid-term outcomes of the sleeves for the management of metaphyseal bone defects in revision TKAs. METHODS: From 2015 to 2019, 44 patients (45 knees) who were operated with cementless porous-coated metaphyseal sleeve in revision TKA were included in this study. Bone defects were assessed according to Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute Classification. On the tibial side, there were 37 type II and six type III, and with regards to the femur, 15 were type II, and four were type III. Through reviewing electronic records, data were collected, including baseline demographics, operative details, information of prothesis, and complications. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed, including Knee Society Scores (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), range of motion (ROM), the radiolucent line, level of joint line, and implant survival rate. Statistical analysis was performed by paired t-test for clinical and radiographic indexes. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 4.4 ± 1.4 years. During surgery, sleeve-related fractures were encountered in four (8.9%) knees, including incomplete tibial fracture of lateral cortex in one knee and of medial cortex in two knees, and longitudinal femoral metaphyseal fracture in one knee. Unions were achieved in all cases at the final follow-up. Significant improvements in KSS and WOMAC scores were found at the final follow-up, respectively, from 83.8 ± 29.1 to 152.9 ± 31.0 (t = -12.146, p < 0.001) and from 148.4 ± 42.3 to 88.1 ± 52.5 (t = 6.025, p < 0.001). The mean ROM improved from 88.7 ± 31.9° to 113.7 ± 13.7° (t = -5.370, p < 0.001). A 75 mm length of cementless stem was used in all patients and only one patient was identified as tibial end-of-stem pain. No sleeve-related revision occurred, and one patient was diagnosed with early postoperative infection and was treated with irrigation and debridement, polyethylene liner exchange, and appropriate antibiotic treatment. The overall implant survival was 97.8% with the endpoint reoperation and 100% with the endpoint revision. Osseointegration at the bone-sleeve interface was found in all patients and no loosening happened. Satisfactory alignment between 3° varus and 3° valgus was achieved in all but not in three patients. CONCLUSION: The use of metaphyseal sleeves in the treatment of bone defects in rTKAs can provide stable fixation and significantly improve the clinical scores at the midterm follow-up. In addition, the rare occurrence of end-of-stem pain suggests routine use of cementless stems. Although there are chances of intraoperative fractures, it has no negative effect on outcome when managed properly.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».