MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4311101752 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7422963

Physicists debate a case of distinguishing a dark opening's 'photon ring'

2022· article· en· W4311101752 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRing (chemistry)PhotonPhysicsAstronomyOpticsChemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The primary picture of a dark opening might hide treasure — however physicists differ about whether it's been found.\n\nA group of researchers say they've uncovered a photon ring, a meager radiance of light around the supermassive dark opening in the cosmic system M87. If genuine, the photon ring would give another test of the dark opening's extreme gravity. However, different researchers question the case. Notwithstanding different news titles proposing the photon ring has been found, numerous physicists stay unconvinced.\n\nDivulged in 2019 by researchers with the Occasion Skyline Telescope, or EHT, the primary picture of a dark opening uncovered a donut molded gleam from hot matter twirling around the dark opening's dull outline (SN: 4/10/19). However, as indicated by Einstein's overall hypothesis of relativity, a more slender ring ought to be superimposed on that thick donut. This ring is delivered by photons, or particles of light, that circle near the dark opening, threw around by the behemoth's gravity prior to getting away and hitting toward Earth.\n\nBecause of this circumnavigation, the photons ought to give "a finger impression of gravity," all the more obviously uncovering the dark opening's properties, says astrophysicist Avery Broderick of the College of Waterloo and the Edge Establishment for Hypothetical Material science in Canada. He and his partners, a subset of researchers from the EHT cooperation, utilized another technique to coax out that unique mark, they report in the Aug. 10 Astrophysical Diary.\n\nMaking pictures with EHT is definitely not a straightforward simple to use undertaking (SN: 4/10/19). Scientists fasten together information from EHT's crew of observatories dispersed across the globe, utilizing different computational methods to remake a picture. Broderick and partners made another dark opening picture expecting it highlighted both a diffuse discharge and a slender ring. On three out of four days of perceptions, the information better paired a picture with the additional dainty ring than one without the ring.\n\nIn any case, that technique has drawn cruel analysis. "The case of a photon ring discovery is outrageous," says physicist Sam Gralla of the College of Arizona in Tucson.\n\nA central matter of conflict: The photon ring is surprisingly splendid, producing around 60% of the light in the picture. As per expectations, it ought to be more similar to 20 percent. "That is a goliath warning," says physicist Alex Lupsasca of Vanderbilt College in Nashville. All the more light ought to come from the dark opening's super shining donut than from the slight photon ring.\n\nThis unforeseen brilliance, Broderick and partners say, happens on the grounds that a portion of the light from the primary sparkle gets generalized with the likes of the photon ring. So the ring's clear splendor doesn't rely just upon the light coming from the ring. The analysts note that a similar impact seemed while testing the technique on reproduced information.\n\nYet, that hodgepodge of indicated photon ring light with other light doesn't make for an exceptionally persuading identification, pundits say. "To guarantee that you've seen a photon ring, I think you need to improve than this," says astrophysicist Dan Marrone of the College of Arizona, an individual from the EHT cooperation who was not a coauthor on the new paper.\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421594\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421608\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421634\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421642\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421652\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421671\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7421680\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422291\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422303\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422363\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422370\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422712\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422718\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422735\n\nhttps://zenodo.org/record/7422739\n\nThe new outcome proposes just that an additional dainty ring gives a superior match to the information, Marrone says, not whether that shape is related with the photon ring. So it brings up the issue of whether researchers are seeing a photon ring by any stretch of the imagination, or simply choosing an irrelevant design in the picture.\n\nHowever, Broderick contends that the elements of the ring — the way that its size and area are true to form and are predictable everyday — support the photon ring understanding.\n\nIn the mean time, in a comparative, free examination, Gralla and physicist Will Lockhart, likewise of the College of Arizona, find no proof for a photon ring, they report in a paper submitted August 22 at arXiv.org. Their examination varied from Broderick and associates' to some extent since it restricted how brilliant the photon ring could be.\n\nTo convincingly recognize the photon ring, a few researchers propose expanding the EHT's group of observatories (SN: 3/18/20). The farther separated the telescopes in the organization are, the better subtleties they might have the option to select — possibly including the photon ring.\n\n"On the off chance that there were a photon ring location," Lupsasca says, "that would be the best thing in physical science this year, notwithstanding numerous years."

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,019
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,033
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,100

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0190,025
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0190,072
Communication savante0,0090,025
Science ouverte0,0030,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0330,038
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,051
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→Travaux en français237 207→