Evaluation of feed restriction and abomasal infusion of resistant starch as models to induce intestinal barrier dysfunction in healthy lactating cows

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Résumé

Intestinal hyperpermeability and subsequent immune activation alters nutrient partitioning and thus, decreases productivity. Developing experimental models of intestinal barrier dysfunction in heathy cows is a prerequisite in identifying nutritional strategies to mitigate it. Six cannulated Holstein cows (mean ± standard deviation, 37 ± 10 kg/d milk yield; 219 ± 97 d in milk; 691 ± 70 kg body weight) were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design experiment with 21-d periods (16-d wash-out and 5-d challenge) to evaluate either feed restriction or hindgut acidosis as potential models for inducing intestinal hyperpermeability. Cows were randomly assigned to treatment sequence within square and treatment sequences were balanced for carryover effects. Treatments during the challenge were (1) control (CTR; ad libitum feeding); (2) feed restriction (FR; total mixed ration fed at 50% of ad libitum feed intake); and (3) resistant starch (RS; 500 g of resistant starch infused in abomasum once a day as a pulse-dose 30 min before morning feeding). The RS (ActiStar RT 75330, Cargill Inc.) was tapioca starch that was expected to be resistant to enzymatic digestion in the small intestine and highly fermentable in the hindgut. Blood samples were collected 4 h after feeding on d 13 and 14 of the wash-out periods (baseline data used as covariate), and on d 1, 3, and 5 of the challenge periods. Fecal samples were collected 4 and 8 h after the morning feeding on d 14 of the wash-out periods and d 5 of the challenge periods. By design, FR decreased dry matter intake (48%) relative to CTR and RS, and this resulted in marked reductions in milk and 3.5% FCM yields over time, with the most pronounced decrease occurring on d 5 of the challenge (34 and 27%, respectively). Further, FR increased somatic cell count by 115% on d 5 of the challenge relative to CTR and RS. Overall, FR increased nonesterified fatty acids (159 vs. 79 mEq/L) and decreased BHB (8.5 vs. 11.2 mg/dL), but did not change circulating glucose relative to CTR. However, RS had no effect on production or metabolism metrics. Resistant starch decreased fecal pH 8 h after the morning feeding (6.26 vs. 6.81) relative to CTR and FR. Further, RS increased circulating lipopolysaccharide binding protein (4.26 vs. 2.74 µg/mL) compared with FR only on d 1 of the challenge. Resistant starch also increased Hp (1.52 vs. 0.48 µg/mL) compared with CTR, but only on d 5 of the challenge. However, neither RS or FR affected concentrations of serum amyloid A, IL1β, or circulating endotoxin compared with CTR. The lack of consistent responses in inflammatory biomarkers suggests that FR and RS did not meaningfully affect intestinal barrier function. Thus, future research evaluating the effects of hindgut acidosis and FR using more intense insults and direct metrics of intestinal barrier function is warranted.

Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.

La notice

Revue

Journal of Dairy Science

Thématique

Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock

Domaine

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Établissements canadiens

Cargill (Canada)

Organismes subventionnaires

Cargill

Mots-clés

Latin squareHindgutAnimal scienceRumenDigestion (alchemy)StarchAbomasumBiologyFecesLactationMorningTotal mixed rationInternal medicineFood scienceChemistryIce calvingMedicinePregnancyMicrobiologyBotany

Résumé présent dans OpenAlex

oui

API

/api/v1/works/W4311453569