733. Letermovir treatment for refractory or resistant cytomegalovirus infection or disease with concurrent organ dysfunction: an interim analysis of a Phase 2 open label study.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is associated with increased morbidity and mortality following solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplantation. Currently, standard of care CMV treatments often have significant myelosuppressive or renal toxicities. Given letermovir’s favorable safety profile when used prophylactically, it may be a safe and efficacious alternative agent for CMV treatment. Methods A proof-of-concept, open-label trial was conducted in patients who lacked effective therapeutic options or presented with baseline organ dysfunction. Participants were eligible for enrollment if they were ≥12 years old and had documented CMV infection refractory to treatment defined as failure to achieve >1 log reduction in CMV viral load (VL) (when VL > 500 IU/mL) or lack of clinical improvement for CMV end-organ disease after ≥14 days of standard CMV treatment. Alternatively, patients with severe myelosuppression and renal dysfunction at baseline or genotypic antiviral resistance were also eligible. Participants were excluded if their current CMV infection developed while receiving letermovir for CMV prophylaxis. Letermovir was administered daily (480 mg PO/IV) for up to 12 weeks, with optional additional 12 weeks of treatment for secondary prophylaxis if clinically indicated. Results Ten patients met eligibility criteria and were enrolled. Reasons for enrollment included ganciclovir resistance (1/10), refractory CMV infection (6/10), renal dysfunction (7/10), and myelosuppression (7/10). The median baseline CMV VL was 1272 IU/ml [interquartile range (IQR); 925, 2546]. Six patients completed the study, three died due to complications of primary disease, and one discontinued due to diarrhea. Five patients (50%) had documented CMV viremia clearance, with a median time to first unquantifiable/undetectable CMV VL of 13 days [IQR; 9,18] and a median treatment duration of 53 days [IQR; 15,84]. Infections and GI disorders were the most common adverse events (AE), none considered related to study drug. No unexpected AE were observed during letermovir treatment. Conclusion Letermovir may be a safe and tolerable alternative for patients with treatment refractory CMV infection or for patients with severe baseline myelosuppression and renal dysfunction. Disclosures Matthew Cheng, MD, AstraZeneca: Honoraria|Cidara Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Scynexis Inc.: Grant/Research Support Sandra Burchett, MD, MSc, merck: Grant/Research Support Sarah P. Hammond, MD, F2G: Advisor/Consultant|F2G: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support Nicolas C. Issa, MD, AiCuris: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support Francisco M. Marty, MD, SM, AlloVir: Advisor/Consultant|Amplyx: Advisor/Consultant|Amplyx: Grant/Research Support|Ansun: Grant/Research Support|Avir: Advisor/Consultant|Chimerix: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|F2G: Advisor/Consultant|F2G: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: Advisor/Consultant|Kyorin: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Regeneron: Advisor/Consultant|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|ReViral: Advisor/Consultant|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support|Symbio: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Grant/Research Support|United Medical: Advisor/Consultant|WHISCO: Grant/Research Support.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».