Influence of Financial Incentives on Employee Performance in Ferry Service, Mombasa County
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The main purpose of the study was to assess the influence of financial incentives on employee performance in Ferry Service, Mombasa. The study employed goal theory, Herzberg theory and self-efficacy theory. The study employed a descriptive survey study design. The study was carried out at Ferry Service, Mombasa with a population of 268 employees. Stratified random sampling with the non-proportionate allocation of sample sizes was used to draw samples from the target population. The researcher used questionnaires to collect data from the respondents. The data that was collected was organised, tabulated and analysed using descriptive statistics. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) Version 26.0 was used to assist in data analysis. The analysed data was presented in tables and figures, percentages and frequencies. The study found that financial incentives were administered by the organisation to which salary and fringe benefits highly influence employee performance the most while bonus was found to be the least since not all employees were benefiting from the incentive except a few employees who represent a quarter of the total employees. The respondents highly agreed that the employees are required to be aware of the fringe benefits offered by the organisation to enhance their performance which was represented by a mean of 1.60 and a standard deviation of 0.769; other respondents agreed that every organisation provides total rewards packages to the employees in addition to the basic pay represented by a mean of 1.97 and a standard deviation of 1.09 while others agreed that some benefits are given to the employees to attract and retain them and to avoid absenteeism from work which was represented by a mean of 2.14 and standard deviation of 1.158. The study concludes that financial incentives provide a big role in influencing employee performance in the organisation. The study recommends that financial incentives given to employees should be emphasised and increased to influence employees to work more and provide what is best for them. The organisation should provide financial incentives to its employees in a fair manner without discrimination. Incentives are there to motivate employees to work more and more and not to discomfort them.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle