Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study on Ejector of Lubricating Oil System of Gas Turbine Engine
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The ejector is a device that uses a high-speed, high-energy working fluid to eject another low-speed, low-energy fluid. The working fluid enters the mixing chamber after being accelerated by the nozzle and forms a low-pressure area in the mixing chamber. Through the mixing and entrainment of the two-fluid boundaries, the ejected fluid mixes with the working fluid and obtains kinetic energy. At the exit of the mixing chamber, the flow tends to be uniform. An expansion pipe is usually connected behind the outlet of the mixing chamber to reduce the flow rate and increase the static pressure. The ejector has a simple structure without moving parts or electrical equipment, and is widely used in wind tunnel facilities, ventilation equipment, refrigeration equipment and other fields. In recent years, ejectors have also been gradually used in aero-engine lubricating oil systems for the supply and discharge of oil and oil-gas mixtures. Although the ejector has a simple structure, many factors affect its ejection efficiency, including but not limited to the shape of the working fluid nozzle and the volume of the mixing chamber. The parameter that measures the efficiency of the ejector is the ejection coefficient, that is, the ratio of the volume flow of the ejected fluid to the working fluid. How to improve the ejector coefficient of ejector under different working conditions is an important subject of ejector research. This research is mainly aimed at a kind of ejector used in an oil-gas mixture of gas turbine engine lubricating oil system. In this study, a single-phase numerical simulation of the internal flow field of the ejector was carried out, and the numerical calculation results were verified experimentally. Under the premise of maintaining the original structure of the ejector, the relative position of the low-pressure zone and the ejected fluid in the mixing chamber was changed to explore the influence of this distance on the ejection efficiency. Under the same inlet and outlet boundary conditions, the design of the ejector working fluid nozzle was changed to explore the influence of the working fluid nozzle shape on the ejection efficiency. These structures include sudden shrinking nozzles, Laval nozzles and convergent nozzles. Numerical calculation results show that the relative position of the low-pressure zone in the mixing chamber and the ejected fluid has a greater impact on the ejection efficiency: 1. If the distance is too small or too large, the ejection efficiency will decrease, and the effect of too large distance is more obvious. 2. When the ejected fluid enters the mixing chamber, the ejection efficiency is maximum when the angle between the streamline direction and the working fluid flow direction is about 75°. The working fluid nozzle has a decisive influence on the ejection efficiency: 1. The sudden shrinking nozzle has a large local loss, and the ejection effect is not obvious. 2. The Laval nozzle ejector has higher requirements on the flow state of the working fluid. When the flow state of the working fluid does not match the geometric design, the ejector efficiency is low. When the two are matched, the Laval nozzle ejector has a higher ejection efficiency; 3. The convergent nozzle ejector has the problem of flow congestion, but it is suitable for working fluids in a variety of flow conditions and has low requirements for geometric design. Compared with the Laval nozzle ejector, this configuration has low efficiency. The results of this research are helpful to determine the design scheme and installation location of the oil-gas mixture ejector of the lubricating oil system and provide reference ideas for the design and optimization of the external pipeline layout of the gas turbine engine.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».