Unique Device Identification–Based Linkage of Hierarchically Accessible Data Domains in Prospective Surgical Hospital Data Ecosystems: User-Centered Design Approach
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The electronic health record (EHR) targets systematized collection of patient-specific, electronically stored health data. The EHR is an evolving concept driven by ongoing developments and open or unclear legal issues concerning medical technologies, cross-domain data integration, and unclear access roles. Consequently, an interdisciplinary discourse based on representative pilot scenarios is required to connect previously unconnected domains. OBJECTIVE: We address cross-domain data integration including access control using the specific example of a unique device identification (UDI)-expanded hip implant. In fact, the integration of technical focus data into the hospital information system (HIS) is considered based on surgically relevant information. Moreover, the acquisition of social focus data based on mobile health (mHealth) is addressed, covering data integration and networking with therapeutic intervention and acute diagnostics data. METHODS: In addition to the additive manufacturing of a hip implant with the integration of a UDI, we built a database that combines database technology and a wrapper layer known from extract, transform, load systems and brings it into a SQL database, WEB application programming interface (API) layer (back end), interface layer (rest API), and front end. It also provides semantic integration through connection mechanisms between data elements. RESULTS: A hip implant is approached by design, production, and verification while linking operation-relevant specifics like implant-bone fit by merging patient-specific image material (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or a biomodel) and the digital implant twin for well-founded selection pairing. This decision-facilitating linkage, which improves surgical planning, relates to patient-specific postoperative influencing factors during the healing phase. A unique product identification approach is presented, allowing a postoperative read-out with state-of-the-art hospital technology while enabling future access scenarios for patient and implant data. The latter was considered from the manufacturing perspective using the process manufacturing chain for a (patient-specific) implant to identify quality-relevant data for later access. In addition, sensor concepts were identified to use to monitor the patient-implant interaction during the healing phase using wearables, for example. A data aggregation and integration concept for heterogeneous data sources from the considered focus domains is also presented. Finally, a hierarchical data access concept is shown, protecting sensitive patient data from misuse using existing scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized medicine requires cross-domain linkage of data, which, in turn, require an appropriate data infrastructure and adequate hierarchical data access solutions in a shared and federated data space. The hip implant is used as an example for the usefulness of cross-domain data linkage since it bundles social, medical, and technical aspects of the implantation. It is necessary to open existing databases using interfaces for secure integration of data from end devices and to assure availability through suitable access models while guaranteeing long-term, independent data persistence. A suitable strategy requires the combination of technical solutions from the areas of identity and trust, federated data storage, cryptographic procedures, and software engineering as well as organizational changes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,025 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».