Motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease are related to the interplay between cortical curvature and thickness
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Brain atrophy in Parkinson’s disease occurs to varying degrees in different brain regions, even at the early stage of the disease. While cortical morphological features are often considered independently in structural brain imaging studies, research on the co-progression of different cortical morphological measurements could provide new insights regarding the progression of PD. This study’s aim was to examine the interplay between cortical curvature and thickness as a function of PD diagnosis, motor symptoms, and cognitive performance. A total of 359 de novo PD patients and 159 healthy controls (HC) from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database were included in this study. Additionally, an independent cohort from four databases (182 PD, 132 HC) with longer disease durations was included to assess the effects of PD diagnosis in more advanced cases. Pearson correlation was used to determine subject-specific associations between cortical curvature and thickness estimated from T1-weighted MRI images. General linear modeling (GLM) was then used to assess the effect of PD diagnosis, motor symptoms, and cognitive performance on the curvature-thickness association. Next, longitudinal changes in the curvature-thickness correlation as well as the predictive effect of the cortical curvature-thickness association on changes in motor symptoms and cognitive performance across four years were investigated. Finally, Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to build a GLM to model PD motor symptom severity cross-sectionally. A significant interaction effect between PD motor symptoms and age on the curvature-thickness correlation was found (βstandardized = 0.11; t(350) = 2.12; p = 0.03). This interaction effect showed that motor symptoms in older patients were related to an attenuated curvature-thickness association. No significant effect of PD diagnosis was observed for the PPMI database (β = 0.03; t(510) = 0.35; p = 0.72). However, in patients with a longer disease duration, a significant effect of diagnosis on the curvature-thickness association was found (βstandardized = 0.31; t(306.7) = 3.49; p = 0.0006). Moreover, rigidity, but not tremor, in PD was significantly related to the curvature-thickness correlation (βstandardized = 0.11, t(350) = 2.24, p = 0.03; βstandardized = -0.03, t(350) = -0.58, p = 0.56, respectively). The curvature-thickness association was attenuated over time in both PD and HC, but the two groups did not show a significantly different effect (βstandardized = 0.03, t(184.7) = 0.78, p = 0.44). No predictive effects of the CC-CT correlation on longitudinal changes in cognitive performance or motor symptoms were observed (all p-values > 0.05). The best cross-sectional model for PD motor symptoms included the curvature-thickness correlation, cognitive performance, and putamen dopamine transporter (DAT) binding, which together explained 14 % of variance. The association between cortical curvature and thickness is related to PD motor symptoms and age. This research shows the potential of modeling the curvature-thickness interplay in PD.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».