MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4313643484 · doi:10.1016/s2666-5247(22)00388-3

Listeria outbreaks cause maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity: we must do better

2023· article· en· W4313643484 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Asma Khalil, Athina Samara, Pat O’Brien, Shamez Ladhani

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Microbe · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Établissements canadiensFuture Earth
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOutbreakListeriaListeria monocytogenesMedicineIncidence (geometry)DiseaseListeria infectionEnvironmental healthBiologyVirologyInternal medicineBacteria

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reports of the global threat of listeriosis to public health are increasing in number, despite the availability of effective antibiotic treatments. Listeria monocytogenes has an intracellular lifecycle and multiplies rapidly, infecting adjacent cells, undetected by antibodies in the extracellular fluid.1Southwick FS Purich DL Intracellular pathogenesis of listeriosis.N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 770-776Crossref PubMed Scopus (239) Google Scholar Found in animal and human faeces, it can contaminate raw meat, and processed and prepared foods. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently reported a listeria outbreak in six states.2Centers for Disease Control and PreventionListeriosis investigation details.https://www.cdc.gov/listeria/outbreaks/deli-11-22/details.htmlDate accessed: November 12, 2022Google Scholar As of Nov 9, 2022, 16 people were infected, although true numbers might be higher; of those with information available, 13 people were hospitalised, including one pregnancy loss and one adult death.2Centers for Disease Control and PreventionListeriosis investigation details.https://www.cdc.gov/listeria/outbreaks/deli-11-22/details.htmlDate accessed: November 12, 2022Google Scholar In the UK, 14 linked cases of listeriosis have been identified since 2020, including eight since January, 2022, one of whom was pregnant.3Food Standards AgencyVulnerable consumers advised of ongoing risk of Listeria associated with ready to eat smoked fish. Aug 30, 2022.https://www.food.gov.uk/news-alerts/news/vulnerable-consumers-advised-of-ongoing-risk-of-listeria-associated-with-ready-to-eat-smoked-fishDate accessed: November 11, 2022Google Scholar According to WHO, listeriosis has an annual incidence of 0·1 to 10 cases per million.4WHOListeriosis. Feb 20, 2018.https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/listeriosisDate accessed: November 12, 2022Google Scholar Most have mild gastroenteritis that resolves within a few days. In the recent US outbreak, cases were linked to delicatessen meat; in the UK, most people who had listeriosis reported eating ready-to-eat smoked fish. Food-borne listeria outbreaks occur frequently, highlighting the need for constant vigilance.5Sebastianski M Bridger NA Featherstone RM Robinson JL Disease outbreaks linked to pasteurized and unpasteurized dairy products in Canada and the United States: a systematic review.Can J Public Health. 2022; 113: 569-578Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar, 6Khsim IEF Mohanaraj-Anton A Horte IB et al.Listeriosis in pregnancy: an umbrella review of maternal exposure, treatment and neonatal complications.BJOG. 2022; 129: 1427-1433Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Clinically vulnerable individuals infected with listeriosis are at risk of severe illness, including meningitis and sepsis. This group includes adults older than 65 years; those with comorbidities, such as cancer, liver failure, or kidney failure; and immunosuppressed individuals.2Centers for Disease Control and PreventionListeriosis investigation details.https://www.cdc.gov/listeria/outbreaks/deli-11-22/details.htmlDate accessed: November 12, 2022Google Scholar As pregnancy reduces cell-mediated immunity, maternal listeriosis can be asymptomatic; if undetected and untreated, infection could lead to miscarriage, stillbirth, preterm birth, or life-threatening neonatal infection presenting with sepsis or meningitis.2Centers for Disease Control and PreventionListeriosis investigation details.https://www.cdc.gov/listeria/outbreaks/deli-11-22/details.htmlDate accessed: November 12, 2022Google Scholar, 4WHOListeriosis. Feb 20, 2018.https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/listeriosisDate accessed: November 12, 2022Google Scholar, 7Xu L Du Y Wu Y Neglected listeria infection in pregnancy in China: 93 cases.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35: 9549-9557Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar Listeriosis is reported to be 12–20 times more prevalent in pregnancy than in the general population,8Elinav H Hershko-Klement A Valinsky L et al.Pregnancy-associated listeriosis: clinical characteristics and geospatial analysis of a 10-year period in Israel.Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 59: 953-961Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar although some of this prevalence might be due to increased identification during pregnancy. A recent systematic review including around 500 pregnant women infected with listeriosis found that diagnosis was primarily by bacterial culture; infection was most common in the third trimester (66%); symptoms were similar to influenza, including fever and fatigue; and patients were treated with intravenous amoxicillin or ampicillin.6Khsim IEF Mohanaraj-Anton A Horte IB et al.Listeriosis in pregnancy: an umbrella review of maternal exposure, treatment and neonatal complications.BJOG. 2022; 129: 1427-1433Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Neonatal listeriosis is categorised as early onset (ie, ≤2 weeks after birth, probably caused by intrauterine exposure) or late-onset (ie, >2 weeks after birth; could also be due to early postnatal exposure). During a large outbreak in Spain in 2019, 207 cases were confirmed; the median age of those affected was 44 years (range 0–94), and 114 (55%) were women. Most (n=154) had mild gastroenteritis, 141 (68%) required hospitalisation and three died; five of 34 pregnant women had a miscarriage.9Fernández-Martínez NF Ruiz-Montero R Briones E et al.Listeriosis outbreak caused by contaminated stuffed pork, Andalusia, Spain, July to October 2019.Euro Surveill. 2022; 27: 2200279Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar In a 2017 outbreak in South Africa,10Thomas J Govender N McCarthy KM et al.Outbreak of listeriosis in South Africa associated with processed meat.N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 632-643Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar 465 (50%) of 937 cases were associated with pregnancy, 406 (87%) of which occurred in neonates. 77 (38%) of the pregnancy-associated cases and 97 (46%) of the remaining patients were HIV positive. Concerningly, 193 (27%) of 728 patients with known outcomes died, including 28% of neonates and 8% of pregnant women, highlighting the disproportionate outcomes in different countries.10Thomas J Govender N McCarthy KM et al.Outbreak of listeriosis in South Africa associated with processed meat.N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 632-643Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar Severe adverse outcomes have also been observed outside outbreak settings. A retrospective US cohort11Craig A Federspiel J Wein L Thompson J Dotters-Katz S Maternal and obstetric outcomes of listeria pregnancy: insights from a national cohort.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35: 10010-10016Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar study of 134 pregnant women hospitalised with listeriosis during 2007–18 reported higher rates of severe maternal morbidity than in those without listeriosis (30·9% vs 1·6%, respectively; p<0·001; 21·2-fold higher adjusted risk; 95% CI 14·0–31·9) including acute respiratory distress syndrome (2·8% vs 0·1%, respectively; p<0·001), mechanical ventilation (1·4% vs 0·0%, respectively; p<0·001), sepsis (28·1% vs 0·1%, respectively; p<0·001), and shock (1·4% vs 0·0%, respectively; p<0·001). Pregnant women with listeria also had higher rates of caesarean delivery, as compared with those who did not (57·9% vs 32·9%, respectively; p<0·001), preterm birth (61·3% vs 7·7%, respectively; p<0·001), and stillbirth (13·5% vs 0·7%, respectively; p<0·001).11Craig A Federspiel J Wein L Thompson J Dotters-Katz S Maternal and obstetric outcomes of listeria pregnancy: insights from a national cohort.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35: 10010-10016Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar The US Food and Drug Administration warns that symptoms can develop within a few hours or as late as 2–3 days after eating contaminated food, although intervals of up to 3 months have been reported. Real-time PCR from bacterial isolates should be used for rapid and accurate diagnosis. Pregnancy-related listeriosis can result in fetal death in 20–30% of cases,8Elinav H Hershko-Klement A Valinsky L et al.Pregnancy-associated listeriosis: clinical characteristics and geospatial analysis of a 10-year period in Israel.Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 59: 953-961Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar although this percentage might be biased by under-reporting of milder cases. Thus, in pregnant women, adequate antibiotic treatment and, depending on disease severity and gestation, immediate delivery might improve outcomes for the baby. This recent listeria outbreak, like the COVID-19 pandemic and 2022 mpox (formerly known as monkeypox) outbreak, highlights the need to continually review and update guidelines for infectious diseases in pregnancy. Only 26% of pregnant women with listeria infection present with fever, and current recommendations might lead to many going undiagnosed, potentially placing fetuses at risk.8Elinav H Hershko-Klement A Valinsky L et al.Pregnancy-associated listeriosis: clinical characteristics and geospatial analysis of a 10-year period in Israel.Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 59: 953-961Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar We continue to advocate for investment in guidance, surveillance, and research in countries with high incidence, so that both local and international communities can benefit from evidence-based management of rare infectious diseases. High-risk populations, and in particular pregnant women and young infants, should not be excluded from treatment and prevention trials. We declare no competing interests.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,013
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,031
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,105

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0130,061
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0060,003
Bibliométrie0,0040,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,005
Communication savante0,0150,021
Science ouverte0,0040,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0140,023
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0310,021

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,121
Tête enseignante GPT0,349
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Lancet MicrobeMême sujetListeria monocytogenes in Food SafetyTravaux en français237 207