Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Scholarship on Russell’s Visit to China Bernard Linsky Jan Vrhovski and Jana S. Rošker, eds. Bertrand Russell’s Visit to China: Selected Texts on the Centenary of Intercultural Dialogues in Logic and Epistemology. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Ljubljana U. P., 2021. Pp. 261. isbn: 978-961-06-0460-0. €19.90. Online: e-knjige.ff.uni-lj.si/znanstvena-zalozba/catalog/book/278. Bertrand Russell visited China from October 1920 to July 1921, where he lived in a courtyard house in Beijing with Dora Black, returning to Britain in August. Russell’s invitation to lecture at Peking University had come from professors who were members of the New Culture Movement, a movement of students and intellectuals dedicated to modernizing China in the aftermath of the 1912 revolution that ended the Ching dynasty. Young Chinese had been educated at Western universities as part of the Boxer Indemnity forced on China in the aftermath of the invasion of China some years before. Among those “returned overseas” students were Hu Shi (Hu Shih), a philosopher who had studied with John Dewey at Columbia University. 1 Another such student was Zhao Yuanren (Yuan Ren Chao), who would serve as Russell’s principal interpreter during the visit. Russell’s academic lectures consisted of a course titled “Problems of Philosophy”, an introductory series loosely following The Problems of Philosophy, a course closely following The Analysis of Mind, which was already in press in 1921, and two lectures on mathematical logic of a projected four that were cut short by Russell’s serious pneumonia that ended his lecturing in March of 1921. In addition to academic lecture courses, Russell delivered numerous lectures on education, communism and social issues while Dora Black lectured on the status of women and on the chapters of the book that they were to collaborate on upon returning from China, The Prospects of Industrial Civilization. Russell first lectured in English with Zhao interpreting into Chinese. Almost all were then published in a series of periodicals, both important newspapers and in specially designed periodicals. Jan Vrhovski and Jana S. Rošker of the Ljubljana University in Slovenia [End Page 186] have translated several essays and letters to the editor that accompanied the visit and debated the significance of Russell’s philosophy for China. They have added interpretive essays of their own to address the issue of the significance for later academic philosophy and logic in China. Although the Communist Party of China (cpc), founded soon after Russell’s departure in 1921, was opposed to Russell’s political views, his theory of knowledge and logic continued to influence what are to this day the leading universities in China, Qinghua [Tsinghua] University and Peking University in Beijing. Wang Hao had studied with Lin Juelin at Qinghua and then later at Harvard with Willard Van Quine. An echo of Russell’s visit to China can be heard in Wang’s 1960 essay on computer-generated proofs of the theorems of Principia Mathematica. Other than the end of this long thread of influence, little is known in the West of Russell’s influence in China, or indeed in China itself, after a number of Russell’s followers were denounced in the 1950s and 1960s, and all “foreign” philosophical influence was replaced by the Maoist orthodoxy. Recent developments in China have led to an increase of interest in Russell’s lectures at their centenary. The philosophy lectures are still not translated into English, although there is a project to collect and translate authoritative versions of the Chinese reports of the lectures to join the collection of Zhao Yuanren's complete works. The centenary of Russell’s visits was marked by two conferences in Beijing and a series of lectures at Peking University. From North America we have a thoroughly researched Harvard ma thesis by John Paisley, Bertrand Russell and China during and after His Visit in 1920. The Covid epidemic appears to have interfered with some other planned conferences on the visit. Paisley’s thesis, an issue of the journal Contemporary Chinese Thought, and this collection by Vrhovski and Rošker are so far the most substantial records of the visit in English since the publication of Collected...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,062 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».