MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4313787798 · doi:10.1353/tmr.2014.0021

Affirming Identity in the Islamic Republic of Mauritania: The ‘Abolition Crisis’ of 1980-1983

2014· article· en· W4313787798 sur OpenAlex
E Ann McDougall

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œMaghreb review/Maghreb review · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAfrican Studies and Geopolitics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIslamLegislationLawProclamationPolitical scienceFraternityLegitimacyColonialismHuman rightsAncient historyHistoryEconomic historyPoliticsArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Maghreb Review, Vol. 39, 2, 2014 © The Maghreb Review 2014 This publication is printed on longlife paper AFFIRMING IDENTITY IN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF MAURITANIA: THE ‘ABOLITION CRISIS’ OF 1980-1983 E ANN MCDOUGALL* INTRODUCTION: ‘THE NARRATIVE’ In 1980-81, the Islamic Republic of Mauritania abolished slavery by proclamation and legislation (United Nations, 1984: Annexes IV, V); two years later, land reforms were implemented to buttress abolition by freeing up ‘dormant’ land, ostensibly to newly freed slaves (RIM 1983). Abolition and its subsequent supporting legislation were widely interpreted as President Colonel Mohamed Kouna ould Haidallah’s response to human rights concerns raised both domestically and internationally 1 . But the unavoidable question remains: how could slavery still need to be abolished in the late 20th century? After all, this was a former French colony wherein the abolition of slavery was a cornerstone of colonial legitimacy (“Liberty, Equality, Fraternity”), an ongoing effort during France’s half-century of colonial mastery over Mauritania. In 1948-9, a United Nations questionnaire was circulated requesting information relative to the current situation of “slavery and servitude”. One G. Poulet responded 2 on behalf of Mauritania that the ‘problem of serviteurs’ was tied to the question of religion; Islam permitted slavery and abolition was therefore in conflict with rights officially recognized by the French and ‘newly consecrated’ as recently as 1946 (Droit du statut personnel). That said, his responses emphasized the domestic nature of the problem: most slaves were really ‘serviteurs’ in the house of a master who fed and clothed them – they were ‘well treated’; most masters had only a few serviteurs and they were, for the most part, born in the household; while slaves occasionally changed hands from one master to another or were ‘loaned’ to guarantee (or work off) a debt, ‘transactions in slaves’ can be considered to be disappearing little by little. In his ‘aperçu’ accompanying responses to the questionnaire, Poulet emphasized the emergence of the hratani (freed slave) class and an ongoing ‘exchange of services’ between it and former masters as indicating an important transition in society that needed to be supported (Poulet 1949) 3 . * University of Alberta, Canada 1 Discussion of these issues can be found in many sources; for a useful starting point see McDougall 2005: 963,4 and Idem. 2010: 262-4 (and bibliographies). 2 Seemingly to the Governor of the French Sudan, although the document does not indicate its recipient (17 Mai 1949) 3 This report and the larger response from the Governor of the French Soudan which incorporated it (1950) is discussed in more detail in McDougall 2007: 252-6. [Note: G. Poulet was not ‘Governor General’ as indicated in that text, that was an error. But nor is this 192 E ANN MCDOUGALL From another perspective, 1980 was, after all, more than thirty years after the post-WWII world saw the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights reject any form of exploitation, and almost twenty years after Mauritania’s first president Mokhtar ould Daddah, signed that Declaration on behalf of his newly independent country (McDougall 2005: 961) 4 . The 1980 declaration, then, was a long time coming and equally -- long over-due. Consequently, when it failed to have any noticeable impact, when the subsequent legislation failed to be implemented and when the 1983 land reform favoured those with the means to purchase it (the ‘nobility’, the slave-owning class) rather than former slaves who worked the land (Leservoisier 1995: 348,9 5 ), the government lost a great deal of credibility both domestically and internationally. Ould Haidallah’s successor, Colonel Maaouya ould Sidi Ahmed Taya, seized power in a military coup d’état in December1984. 6 During the twenty years he ruled (for the most part through single-party dictatorship 7 ), the rhetoric around slavery and abolition remained much the same. But according to repeated reports from international agencies and ‘fact-finding missions’ (of varying repute), little changed for those living in ‘slave-like’ conditions (United Nations, Annex VI 1984; McDougall 2005: 967, ft. 28; 2010: 265, 6). 8 Domestically, voices speaking out on behalf of slaves and former slaves – for the most part by former slaves themselves (haratin), grew louder. From a 1970s association...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,014
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,866
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,750

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0140,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,343
Écart entre enseignants0,316 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle