Utah Genealogical Society: Information Technologies’ Evolution
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The research purpose was to study the evolution of information technologies of the Genealogical Society of Utah (GSU; now – FamilySearch International) and familiarize the Ukrainian reader with them. The research methodology took into consideration information technologies development in historical retrospect. The scientifi c novelty was based on the analysis of publications about GSU in Ukraine and abroad. Conclusions. GSU is one of the world leaders in genealogical research. Yet the results of this research create an image of GSU as a world-class scientifi c and research company for software and information technologies development. Throughout its history, GSU has mastered the path from paper, through microfi lm and to digital fi le, from DOS to Windows, from disks to the Internet, from website «lockups» to responding instantly, and from outsourcing to in-house digital storage and tape libraries. GSU cooperates with the most prominent corporations in the sphere of information storage and management. For more than half a century, independently and in cooperation, the GSU has developed, tested and put into operation many variants of computer programs and technologies, including the universally accepted specifi cation for the exchange of genealogical data between computer programs of diff erent manufacturers – GEDCOM. GSU focused on processing and organizing vast arrays of genealogical information, indexing, searching, providing diff erentiated access for users via the Internet, and fi nally, guaranteed storage and backup. In these areas GSU creatively applied state-of-the-art technologies. References: 1. Allen, B. Ja., Embry, L. Je. & Mehr, K. B. (1995). Hearts Turned to the Fathers: A History of the Genealogical Society of Utah, 1894–1994. Brigham Young University Studies. 392 p. [in English].2. Barrett, A. W., Hutchison F. D. L., Kennard J. D., Nielson E. H. & Quass D. (2004). Digital Mountain: From Granite Archive to Global Access Introduction to Family History. IEEE Proceedings, International Workshop on Document Image Analysis for Libraries (DIAL 24). Palo Alto, CA. (pр. 14–121). [in English].3. Bennett, F. A. (1953). The Record Copying Program of the Utah Genealogical Society. The American Archivist, 16(3), 227–232). [in English]. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.16.3.d80hv277028178664. Bybee, C. H. (2008). Online Genealogical Research Resources. Brigham Young University Studies, 47(1), 153–164). [in English].5. Greighton, T. (2017). LOC Designing Storage Architectures. Retrieved from https://digitalpreservation.gov/meetings/DSA2017/Day_1/25_GD_Tom_Creighton_LDS.pdf [in English].6. Little, H. (Winter 2008). Microfilm, Mormons and the Technology of the Archive. eSharp Journal, University of Glasgow, 12. Retrieved from https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_102866_smxx.pdf [in English].7. Lofthouse, S. M. (May 1971). A History of the Genealogical Society of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints to 1970. A Thesis presented to the Department of Church History and Doctrine Brigham Young University. In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Master of Arts. [in English]. 8. Mehr, K. B. (2014). Dawning of the Digital Age in the Family History Department, 1995–2011. 146 p. [in English].9. Papakin, H. (2008). Arkhivy Ukrainy v mizhnarodnykh ta mizhrehionalnykh prohramakh zberezhennia kulturnoi spadshchyny: dosvid ta perspektyvy [Archives of Ukraine in international and interregional cultural heritage preservation programs: experience and prospects]. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 1–2, 150–157. [in Ukrainian].10. Powell, F. T. (1976). Saving the Past for the Future – Tales of International Search and Cooperation. The American Archivist, 39(3), 311–318. [in English]. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.39.3.g0748k223762q3w511. Sherwinter N. & Wright T. G. (2012). Advancing Data Integrity in a Digital Preservation Archive Ex Libris and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. iPRES2012. Proceeding of the 9th Internationbal Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects. University of Toronto, Faculty of Information. (pp. 150–154). [in English].12. Wright, T. G. (2012). Using Rosetta, StorageGRID, and New IBM Tape Solutions to Implement State-of-the-Art Digital Preservation. Retrieved from http://documents.el-una.org/923/2/ELUNA_Digital_Preservation_at_the_Church_Final_2012_3_7.pdf [in English].
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».