MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4315474234 · doi:10.1093/gerona/glac246

A Golden Age for Biogerontology and Geroscience Is Approaching: Our Journal Is Here to Disseminate the Best of That New Knowledge

2023· editorial· en· W4315474234 sur OpenAlexaff
Gustavo Duque

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journals of Gerontology Series A · 2023
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineDecision Sciences
ThématiqueMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDisseminationGerontologyPsychologyPolitical scienceMedicineLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sibyl of Cumae was loved by Apollo. He bribed her by offering to prolong her life for as many years as there were grains in a heap of dust, in return for her embraces. She refused him and although he kept his word, he denied her perpetual youth, so she was commanded to centuries as a wizened crone. Metamorphoses 14:130–153 Aging is the leading risk factor for most chronic diseases. Understanding the aging process will allow us to better identify the pathophysiological mechanisms of those conditions, which will lead to the development of new preventative, diagnostic, and therapeutic interventions. For more than 70 years, The Journals of Gerontology: Biological Sciences (JGBS) has published groundbreaking research in the fields of aging, geroscience, biogerontology, and biological and molecular mechanisms of common age-related diseases. Our impact factor is now 6.591; a significant achievement only obtained thanks to the dedication of a team of editors, members of the editorial board and supporting administrative personnel, and, very importantly, our authors who submit their best work to the journal and the peer reviewers who improve the quality of our published papers by providing their valuable feedback and recommendations. By assuming the role of Editor-in-Chief of the JGBS, I am aware of the significant responsibility I have in continuing the major achievements of my predecessors. I want to thank Drs. Rozalyn Anderson and David Le Couteur for their outstanding job as journal Co-Editors for the last 4 years. As editors, they navigated the early challenging times of a pandemic, maintaining the high quality of the publication and increasing the journal’s impact. Their success is also thanks to the support of a very committed Editorial Board. Times are changing in the aging research field. International initiatives involving biogerontology and geroscience are being created globally. New major funding initiatives are being implemented, and a significant amount of financial support is becoming available to researchers interested in exploring shared age-related mechanisms for chronic conditions, and the biological and molecular mechanisms of the aging process per se. All these advances allow me to predict that we are entering a “golden age” for biogerontology and geroscience research. As Editor-in-Chief, I am eagerly looking forward to participating in this golden age by helping to strengthen our mission to disseminate the best of this new knowledge among our aging research scholars, the scientific community, and, very importantly, our population in general, whose well-being and healthy aging should be the primary objective of all what we do at the bench, bedside, and in our communities. This new age will come with many fresh opportunities. We will use social media as a communication platform to enhance the dissemination of our published papers while promoting our authors’ achievements. We will also profit from the fact that beginning in January 2023, our journal will be fully online and include additional audiovisual materials such as graphical abstracts, slides ready for presentations, and videos. Regarding our new generation of authors and peer reviewers, we will establish a community of publishing scholars that will prioritize the participation of junior and mid-career investigators, while promoting inclusion and equity and applying the principles of the Reframing Aging initiative. With these objectives in mind, our Editorial Board will be rotated, and new members from all over the world will be invited to join us. A call for expression of interest (EOI) will be posted on our website soon. If you are a researcher in the biology of aging at any stage of your career, you are welcome to submit your EOI. All applications will be considered. As a clinician and biomedical scientist, I will be particularly interested in publishing articles that report discoveries with solid potential to elucidate new biomarkers or diagnostic or therapeutic methods to prevent and treat (separately or simultaneously) the multiple age-related diseases that challenge our health systems and affect the quality of life of older persons worldwide. With the Editor of the Medical Sciences section of the journal, Dr. Lewis Lipsitz, we will continue the tradition of publishing translational articles that provide biomedical evidence for current or future clinical interventions. Overall, our shared goal will be to simplify the submission process and provide our authors with an enriching, helpful, and enjoyable publishing experience. In summary, we are ready to embrace a new golden age in our field. Contrary to Sybil, we don’t have to spend our efforts counting grains in a heap of dust. Instead, while some investigators will work on ensuring that our older persons can age gracefully, functionally independent, and healthy, others will be looking to ensure perpetual youth. Which approach will prevail will be only known after our authors share their discoveries in the coming years. Our journal is ready to disseminate those discoveries.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,031
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,094
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,031
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,162

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0310,094
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0050,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0080,004
Bibliométrie0,0070,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,005
Communication savante0,0150,008
Science ouverte0,0050,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0190,034
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,011

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,716
Tête enseignante GPT0,555
Écart entre enseignants0,161 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journals of Gerontology Series AMême sujetMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsTravaux en français237 207