Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Over the last five years, I have tried to use academic resources to add to my own lived understanding of Indian Act registration and the ways that it has crafted notions of who is a credible Indian in Canada.I have read, heard, and doled out a lot of wellplaced criticism about the Act's perversity, not to mention Canada's general self-affirmed claim to name and govern Indigenous peoples.The incessant hate-on toward this piece of legislation makes it seem as if, for many, it is the physical manifestation of colonialism in this country.To be clear, the Indian Act has never defined Indigenous identities in their vast and dynamic richness; rather, through the label "Indian, " it and the band membership codes that it has inspired have crafted a particular representation of Indigeneity based not only on a patriarchal model of ascription, but on a racialized veneration of the antiquity of so-called "Indian blood." These criteria have served to physically and symbolically separate many Indigenous people (and peoples), and disenfranchised women and their descendants in particular, from their respective reserves and ancestral lands and families.This is the common narrative that is told about Indian Act registration.While completely accurate, there is also more to this story.Despite the recent and successful political and activist efforts that have sought, and continue to seek, a rejection of the language of "Indian-ness, Aboriginality, and Indigeneity" to one that rightly recognizes our distinct peoplehoods, there still remains, for many, an emotional investment in Canadian legislative determinations of Indian status.In other words, being a Canadian Indian also referred to as being "Status, " or, inaccurately in the Prairie provinces, as being "treaty, " is important to many people.Among those in my own First Nation, at least, it is evident that the Indian Act's version of Indian-ness has, unfortunately, become more than an external state category.It has made its way into some processes of self-definition in the development of individual identities and community perceptions of authenticity.As a result, Indian registration has come to determine degrees of relatedness between community and family members dividing them legally and (at times) physically, while setting people on treacherous journeys of Indigenous existential crisis.All this stems from the Act's definitional framework (i.e., who or what is an Indian), without even getting into any of the guts of its heavy-handed administration of Indian and band life.Academic literature on the matter remains heavily jurisprudential, and distills law from the local and personal ways in which legal categories impact everyday life.As a result, I have found that the academic literature does not tend to reflect the ways in which people emotionally feel the impacts of the Indian Act categorization scheme and, more importantly, how they resist its rigid boundaries.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».