MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4316081592 · doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0000859868.39932.2f

S807 Corticosteroid-Sparing Effects of Ustekinumab Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis Through 4 Years: UNIFI Long-Term Extension

2022· article· en· W4316081592 sur OpenAlexaff
María T. Abreu, Ellen Scherl, David Rowbotham, Silvio Danese, William J. Sandborn, Miao Ye, Hongyan Zhang, Remo Panaccione, Waqqas Afif, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Rupert W. Leong, Bruce E. Sands, Ramesh Arasaradnam, Colleen Marano

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueInflammatory Bowel Disease
Établissements canadiensMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePlaceboUstekinumabUlcerative colitisMaintenance therapyInternal medicineClinical endpointRandomizationGastroenterologyCorticosteroidColonoscopyClinical trialSurgeryDiseaseColorectal cancerChemotherapyAdalimumab

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Ustekinumab (UST) is an IL-12/23p40 inhibitor approved for treatment of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC). In the UNIFI maintenance study of patients (pts) with moderate to severe UC, > 90% of pts who achieved clinical response or remission at week (wk) 44 were not receiving corticosteroids, an important therapeutic goal. In this analysis, we describe the corticosteroid-sparing effects of UST treatment through 4 years (yrs) among pts who were treated in the UNIFI long-term extension (LTE). Methods: Overall, 523 intravenous UST induction responders were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) maintenance therapy (placebo [PBO], n=175; UST 90mg every 12 wks [q12w], n=172; or UST 90mg q8w, n=176). A total of 284 UST pts completed wk44 and were treated in the LTE. PBO pts were discontinued after study unblinding. Based on investigator’s clinical judgement of UC disease activity, pts in the LTE were eligible to receive a dose adjustment starting at wk56: PBO to q8w, q12w to q8w, and q8w to q8w (sham adjustment). Pts in PBO or q8w groups were only eligible for dose adjustment or sham dose adjustment before unblinding. Efficacy was evaluated using symptomatic remission (Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0). During the maintenance study, all pts receiving corticosteroids at maintenance baseline were required to initiate tapering. Through wk200 of the LTE, symptomatic remission endpoints were calculated with treatment failure and missing data nonresponder imputation, and dose adjustment was not considered to be a treatment failure. Missing corticosteroid dose data were managed using last observation carried forward. Results: Of the 284 pts randomized to UST and treated in the LTE, 139 were receiving corticosteroids at maintenance baseline. Of these, 79.1% (n=110) were no longer receiving corticosteroids at wk200. Rates of corticosteroid-free symptomatic remission at wk200 were generally similar for the q8w and q12w maintenance doses (Table). Of the UST-treated pts in symptomatic remission at wk200, 94/96 (97.9%) in the q12w group and 91/96 (94.8%) in the q8w group were corticosteroid free. Conclusion: UST maintenance therapy, with both q8w and q12w dosing regimens, was effective in reducing and eliminating the use of corticosteroids in pts with UC through 4 yrs. The majority of pts in symptomatic remission were corticosteroid free through 4 yrs of treatment with UST. Table 1. - Symptomatic remission and corticosteroid-sparing effects in patients who were randomized to UST in maintenance and were treated in the long-term extension Analysis 90 mg UST SC q12w a 90 mg UST SC q8w a Combined UST a Randomized patients in maintenance who were treated in the LTE, N 141 143 284 Patients in symptomatic remission, n/N (%) d,e,f Week 44 117/141 (83.0) 119/143 (83.2) 236/284 (83.1) Week 200 96/141 (68.1) 96/143 (67.1) 192/284 (67.6) Patients in symptomatic remission and not receiving corticosteroids, n/N (%) b,d,e,f Week 44 111/141 (78.7) 115/143 (80.4) 226/284 (79.6) Week 200 94/141 (66.7) 91/143 (63.6) 185/284 (65.1) Patients in symptomatic remission and not receiving corticosteroids among patients receiving corticosteroids at maintenance baseline, n/N (%) b,c,d,e,f Week 44 49/68 (72.1) 56/71 (78.9) 105/139 (75.5) Week 200 39/68 (57.4) 47/71 (66.2) 86/139 (61.9) Patients who were able to eliminate the use of corticosteroids, n/N (%) b,c Week 44 61/68 (89.7) 64/71 (90.1) 125/139 (89.9) Week 200 53/68 (77.9) 57/71 (80.3) 110/139 (79.1) LTE, long-term extension; q8w, every 8 weeks; q12w, every 12 weeks; SC, subcutaneous; UST, ustekinumab.aRandomized group at maintenance Week 0 regardless of whether patients had a dose adjustment during the LTE.bPatients who had a missing value in corticosteroid use at the designated visit had their last available value carried forward to the designated visit.cDenominator is the number of patients who were receiving concomitant corticosteroids at maintenance baseline.dSymptomatic remission is defined as a stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.ePatients who had both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores missing at a visit were considered not to be in symptomatic remission for that visit.fPatients who had an ostomy or colectomy, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an adverse event of worsening of ulcerative colitis prior to the designated visit were considered not to be in symptomatic remission.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Même sujetInflammatory Bowel Disease→Travaux en français237 207→