S983 Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Who Responded to Vedolizumab at Week 6
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Vedolizumab (VDZ) has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Identifying similarities in baseline characteristics among patients who respond to VDZ could be valuable to establish the patient population that is most suitable for treatment with VDZ. Methods: The baseline characteristics of patients with UC who responded to VDZ in the phase 3 clinical trials, GEMINI 1, VARSITY, and VISIBLE 1, and the phase 4 clinical trial, ENTERPRET, were pooled in order to identify similarities within the responder population. All four trials included adult patients with moderate to severe UC who had a prior inadequate response or loss of response to conventional therapies or anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) treatment. Patients received VDZ 300 mg intravenously at weeks 0 and 2. The primary outcome was a response at week 6 defined as a decrease in partial Mayo score of ≥ 2 points and ≥ 25% from baseline, with a decrease in rectal bleeding sub-score of ≥ 1 or an absolute rectal bleeding sub-score of ≤ 1. Patient characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics, with mean or median values calculated across all four trials for continuous variables, and the number and proportion of responders reported for categorical variables. Results: Of the total of 1,183 patients enrolled across the four trials, 989 (83.6%) were White, while Black or African American patients were the most underrepresented group (2.8%). At week 6, 783 patients (66.2%) had a clinical response to VDZ. The baseline characteristics of these responders are shown in Table. Of the VDZ responders, the mean disease duration was 7.4 years, and 24.5% had experienced previous treatment failure with anti-TNFα treatment. Most responders had left-sided colitis or pancolitis (Table), and the majority had moderate or severe disease at baseline (complete Mayo score category: moderate, n = 333 [42.5%]; severe, n = 440 [56.2%]). For rectal bleeding and stool frequency sub-scores, rectal bleeding with obvious blood in stool and 5 or more stools than normal were the most frequently observed categories at baseline, respectively (Table). Conclusion: These baseline characteristics of patients who respond to VDZ at 6 weeks may serve as an indicator to determine which patients are most likely to respond to VDZ treatment. Table 1. - Baseline demographics and disease characteristics of patients who responded to VDZ treatment at week 6 Characteristic GEMINI 1 n = 122 ENTERPRET n = 131 VARSITY n = 263 VISIBLE 1 n = 267 Race, n (%) White 97 (79.5) 104 (79.4) 233 (88.6) 221 (82.8) Black or African American 3 (2.5) 12 (9.2) 0 2 (0.7) Asian 21 (17.2) 12 (9.2) 24 (9.1) 42 (15.7) Other 1 (0.8) 3 (2.3) 6 (2.3) 2 (0.7) Duration of disease, years, mean (SD) 6.5 (5.42) 8.3 (8.30) 7.3 (7.65) 7.6 (6.25) Disease location, n (%)a Proctosigmoiditis 8 (6.6) 22 (16.8) – 37 (13.9) Left-sided colitis 56 (45.9) 52 (39.7) – 112 (41.9) Extensive colitis 11 (9.0) 10 (7.6) – 20 (7.5) Pancolitis 47 (38.5) 47 (35.9) – 97 (36.3) Missing 0 0 – 1 (0.4) Complete Mayo score, median 8.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 Complete Mayo score, categories, n (%) Mild (score < 6) 4 (3.3) 3 (2.3) 2 (0.8) 0 Moderate (score 6–8) 62 (50.8) 68 (51.9) 105 (39.9) 98 (36.7) Severe (score 9–12) 56 (45.9) 60 (45.8) 155 (58.9) 169 (63.3) Missing 0 0 1 (0.4) 0 Mayo endoscopic sub-score, categories, n (%) Moderate disease 62 (50.8) 77 (58.8) 100 (38.0) 94 (35.2) Severe disease 60 (49.2) 54 (41.2) 162 (61.6) 173 (64.8) Missing 0 0 1 (0.4) 0 Partial Mayo score, median 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Partial Mayo score, categories, n (%) Mild (score ≤ 4) 25 (20.5) 25 (19.1) 36 (13.7) 22 (8.2) Moderate (score 5–6) 49 (40.2) 56 (42.7) 114 (43.3) 115 (43.1) Severe (score 7–9) 48 (39.3) 50 (38.2) 113 (43.0) 130 (48.7) Rectal bleeding sub-score, categories, n (%) No blood seen 10 (8.2) 24 (18.3) 19 (7.2) 12 (4.5) Streak of blood with stool less than half of the time 40 (32.8) 35 (26.7) 70 (26.6) 78 (29.2) Obvious blood with stool most of the time 57 (46.7) 52 (39.7) 153 (58.2) 148 (55.4) Blood alone passes 15 (12.3) 20 (15.3) 21 (8.0) 29 (10.9) Stool frequency sub-score, categories, n (%) Normal number of stools 10 (8.2) 4 (3.1) 7 (2.7) 6 (2.2) 1–2 stools more than normal 21 (17.2) 22 (16.8) 32 (12.2) 33 (12.4) 3–4 stools more than normal 42 (34.4) 48 (36.6) 119 (45.2) 98 (36.7) ≥ 5 stools more than normal 49 (40.2) 57 (43.5) 105 (39.9) 130 (48.7) Anti-TNFα treatment status, n (%) Naive 80 (65.6) 5 (3.8) 217 (82.5) 156 (58.4) Failure 36 (29.5) 1 (0.8) 46 (17.5) 109 (40.8) Exposed, not failed 6 (4.9) 125 (95.4) 0 2 (0.8) SD, standard deviation; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor alpha; VDZ, vedolizumab. a, Disease location was not recorded for VARSITY.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».