MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4316086251 · doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0000859612.85996.2f

S743 Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab for Ulcerative Colitis Through 4 Years: Final Results From the UNIFI Long-Term Extension

2022· article· en· W4316086251 sur OpenAlexaff
Bruce E. Sands, María T. Abreu, Silvio Danese, William J. Sandborn, Miao Ye, Hongyan Zhang, Remo Panaccione, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Ellen Scherl, Rupert W. Leong, David Rowbotham, Ramesh Arasaradnam, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Waqqas Afif, Colleen Marano

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueInflammatory Bowel Disease
Établissements canadiensMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineUstekinumabUlcerative colitisExtension (predicate logic)Term (time)Internal medicineDiseaseProgramming languagePhysicsAdalimumab

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Ustekinumab (UST) is approved for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment. Here we report final results of the UNIFI long-term extension (LTE) study with efficacy and safety through 4 years (yrs) of subcutaneous (SC) UST treatment. Methods: Overall, 523 intravenous UST induction responders were randomized to SC maintenance therapy: 175 SC placebo (PBO); 172 UST 90mg every 12 weeks (q12w); 176 UST 90mg q8w. The nonrandomized population included UST induction nonresponders at week (wk) 8 who received SC UST, responded 8wks later and continued receiving UST q8w, and PBO induction responders continuing PBO. Patients (pts) completing wk44 were eligible to continue treatment in LTE. PBO pts discontinued after study unblinding. Starting at wk56, randomized pts with UC worsening could adjust to q8w. Efficacy was evaluated in UST-randomized pts (n=284) using symptomatic remission (Mayo stool frequency subscore 0/1 and rectal bleeding subscore 0). Safety was evaluated for all 588 pts treated in LTE (randomized/nonrandomized populations). Results: Among all pts randomized to UST at maintenance baseline (intent-to-treat population with nonresponder imputation for missing data and treatment failure criteria), 55.2% were in symptomatic remission at wk200 (biologic naïve 67.2%; biologic failure 41.6%; Table); 53.2% achieved corticosteroid-free symptomatic remission at wk200. Overall, 42.7% of biologic failure and 18.8% of biologic naïve pts randomized to UST and treated in the LTE discontinued treatment between wks44 and 200. Among randomized pts who continued UST in the LTE, 67.6% were in symptomatic remission at wk200; 72.9% of those in clinical remission at wk44 were in symptomatic remission at wk200; and 85.1% of pts with observed data at wk200 were in symptomatic remission. Safety events were similar between UST-treated pts and PBO throughout study. Maintenance wks0-220 included 1647.4 (UST) and 301.7 (PBO) pt yrs of follow-up. Safety events per 100 pt yrs of follow-up for UST vs PBO were adverse events (AEs): 214.45 vs 288.04, serious AEs: 7.22 vs 10.61, and serious infections: 2.00 vs 3.31. During the final yr of the LTE, no deaths or major cardiovascular events were reported in UST pts. Among UST pts, 2 cases of colorectal cancer and 1 case of cytomegalovirus were reported. (Figure) Conclusion: Pts receiving SC UST generally maintained clinical benefit through 4 yrs. No new safety signals were observed. (Figure)Figure 1.: Symptomatic Remission of Randomized Patients in Maintenance Who Were Treated in Long-Term Extension (LTE) Through Week 200 (a,b,c). Symptomatic remission: Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0; SC: subcutaneous; q8w: every 8 weeks; q12w: every 12 weeks. a) Patients who had both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores missing at a visit were considered not to be in symptomatic remission for that visit. b) Randomized group at maintenance Week 0 regardless of whether patients had a dose adjustment during the long-term extension. c) Patients who had an ostomy or colectomy, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an adverse event of worsening of ulcerative colitis prior to the designated visit were considered not to be in symptomatic remission. Table 1. - Symptomatic remissiona rates during the LTE in randomized patients Analysis 90 mg UST SC q12w b 90 mg UST SC q8w b Overall UST Symptomatic remission in the ITT population c,d,e (treatment failure and missing data nonresponder imputation) Week 44, n/N (%) 107/172 (62.2) 119/176 (67.6) 226/348 (64.9) Week 200, n/N (%) 96/172 (55.8) 96/176 (54.5) 192/348 (55.2) Symptomatic remission in biologic naïve f patients Week 44, n/N (%) 68/95 (71.6) 57/79 (72.2) 125/174 (71.8) Week 200, n/N (%) 62/95 (65.3) 55/79 (69.6) 117/174 (67.2) Symptomatic remission in biologic failure f patients Week 44, n/N (%) 34/70 (48.6) 57/91 (62.6) 91/161 (56.5) Week 200, n/N (%) 30/70 (42.9) 37/91 (40.7) 67/161 (41.6) Corticosteroid-free symptomatic remission in the ITT population c,d,e,g Week 44, n/N (%) 105/172 (61.0) 116/176 (65.9) 221/348 (63.5) Week 200, n/N (%) 94/172 (54.7) 91/176 (51.7) 185/348 (53.2) Symptomatic remission in patients treated in the LTE (treatment failure and missing data nonresponder imputation) d,e Week 44, n/N (%) 117/141 (83.0) 119/143 (83.2) 236/284 (83.1) Week 200, n/N (%) 96/141 (68.1) 96/143 (67.1) 192/284 (67.6) Symptomatic remission up to the time of dose adjustment with treatment failure rules applied in patients treated in the LTE d (modified as observed h ) Week 44, n/N (%) 117/141 (83.0) 119/143 (83.2) 236/284 (83.1) Week 200, n/N (%) 58/65 (89.2) 73/89 (82.0) 131/154 (85.1) AE, adverse event; ITT, intent-to-treat; LTE, long-term extension; q8w, every 8 weeks; q12w, every 12 weeks; SC, subcutaneous; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; UC, ulcerative colitis; UST, ustekinumab.aSymptomatic remission is defined as a stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.bRandomized group at maintenance Week 0 regardless of whether or not patients had a dose adjustment during the long-term extension.cPatients who had a prohibited change in UC medication, an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 visit were considered not to be in symptomatic remission at Week 44.dPatients who had an ostomy or colectomy, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC after Week 44 and prior to Week 200, were considered not to be in symptomatic remission at Week 200.ePatients who had both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores missing at a visit were considered not to be in symptomatic remission for that visit.fEfficacy was evaluated only in patients with a history of biologic failure to ≥1 biologic (anti-TNFα or integrin antagonist) and those who were biologic naïve; 7 UST q12w and 6 UST q8w patients who were biologic-experienced but did not have documentation of a history of biologic failure are excluded.gPatients who had a missing value in corticosteroid use had their last value carried forward.hThe observed data excluded patients with missing data and had not had treatment failure (i.e., an ostomy or colectomy, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC) prior to the designated visit.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Même sujetInflammatory Bowel Disease→Travaux en français237 207→