Addressing Global Disparities in Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care: introduction to the special series
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Over one million children are born with congenital heart disease (CHD) each year around the world (1).Approximately one in two children with CHD will require surgical or interventional care at least once in their lifetime (2), whereas one in five will need an intervention to survive to their first birthday (3).In addition, rheumatic heart disease (RHD) represents the most common acquired cardiovascular disease among children and adolescents (4).RHD is a disease of poverty largely eradicated in high-income countries, yet it continues to affect dozens of millions of people across low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) (4,5).Despite this considerable burden of cardiac surgical disease, over 90% of children in LMICs no access to cardiovascular care (6,7) resulting in more than 90% of deaths and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) in children to be "excess" (8).The current special series on "Addressing Global Disparities in Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care" provides a detailed overview of cardiovascular care for children living with cardiovascular diseases worldwide, with a particular emphasis on variable-resource contexts, where the disparities are greatest.Articles are briefly introduced in this editorial and include: (I) Addressing Global Disparities in Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care: introduction to the special series.(II) Narrative review in pediatric and congenital heart surgery in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges and opportunities in a new era.(III) "Regale una Vida" a successful social program for underprivileged children with congenital heart disease in a middle-income country.(IV) Pediatric cardiac NGOs: collaboration and coordination.(V) Fostering a sustainable pediatric cardiac workforce in the developing world during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.(VI) Pediatric Cardiac Development Assistance in Conflict Zones.(VII) The road to regionalization in congenital heart surgery: a narrative review.(VIII) Generating political support for cardiac surgical care in resource-limited contexts: experience from Nepal.(IX) Ethics of resource allocation to congenital heart surgery in variable-resource contexts.This special series may expand upon and accelerate the contemporary global health discourse, which largely lacks the integration of pediatric and congenital cardiovascular care.Without an urgent recognition of the importance of pediatric and congenital cardiovascular care, the 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goal Agenda cannot and will not be attained (9). Global disparitiesRecent data confirm great disparities in the number of pediatric cardiac surgeons per million population.In high-income countries, there are approximately 9.51 pediatric cardiac surgeons per million under-15 population compared to only 0.07 per million in low-income countries (10).However, the number of pediatric cardiac surgeons managing neonates and infants with CHD is assumed to be far lower, although not exactly quantified (11).As such, Murala et al. (12).discuss opportunities to scale pediatric and congenital cardiac care capacity through the lens of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which exacerbated disparities in access to cardiac care (13,14).These opportunities include but are not limited to (I) frugal innovation, which has enabled programs to do more with less as a result of resource constraints and lacking supply chains (15,16); (II) online learning, which reduced barriers to educational participation by bringing workshops and classrooms into one's own home, regardless of one's location (17,18); and (III) simulation training, which facilitates technical skills training in a low-, medium-, or even high-fidelity manner when real-world opportunities are not available or the risks of real-world exposure are too high (19)(20)(21).Disparities further vary by and within regions (22).For example, Manuel et al. (23) illustrate how, in sub-Saharan Africa, late diagnosis after the first year of life is common and associated with considerably higher mortality, reduced access to
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».