Effectiveness of Small Group Discussion Sessions in Teaching Biochemistry for Undergraduate Medical Students
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background and aim: Teaching is an important part of the medical curriculum. Different teaching methods include small group discussions, demonstrations, inquiry approaches, lectures, problem solving methods, and tutorials. Group discussions are at the core of medical education because they help students learn more effectively. As a result, the current study sought to analyze the efficacy of small group discussions in teaching biochemistry to undergraduate medical students. Place and Duration: Gomal Medical College MTI, Dera Ismail Khan and Department of Biochemistry of Amna Inayat Medical College Lahore for the duration from March 2022 to August 2022. Method: This study included 50 undergraduate medical students of first year registered in international medical program. Prior to study conduction, ethical approval and informed written consent was taken. Student’s perception regarding small group discussion sessions were elicited based on unknown questionnaires provided to them. Likert scale was used to show their level of agreement with the questionnaire's claims. Results: Of the 50 undergraduate medical students, 28 (56%) were male and 22 (44%) were females students. About 64.6% (n=32) students believed that their grasp over the study material improved with small group discussion and 52.4% (n=26) agreed to the facilitation of active learning in small group discussion. Communication skills and clinical reasoning improved by small group discussion were claimed by 36% (n=18) medical students. Majority of undergraduate medical students 68% (n=34) strongly agreed to the claims that small group discussion helped them to correlate medical problems with biochemical concepts. Conclusion: The present study concluded that small group discussion in combination with lectures appears to provide the best instruction for the learner or medical students. Mostly students emphasized on importance of small group discussion in terms of topic better comprehension, promoting knowledge, correlation of biochemical ideas with medical issues, and interest. Similarly, they discussed the need of developing effective communication skills, as well as leadership and teamwork abilities. Keywords: Medical students, Undergraduate, Small group discussion, Biochemistry, Effectiveness
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle