Patient and Parent Perspectives on Testicular Adrenal Rest Tumors in Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Testicular adrenal rest tumors (TARTs) increase the risk of infertility in males with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). There is no consensus regarding at what age screening testicular ultrasounds should begin and how often they should be repeated. Furthermore, it is unknown whether patients and parents are aware of the significance of TARTs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate awareness, concern, and screening rates for TARTs in males with classic CAH. METHODS: Males with CAH and parents completed an online questionnaire from 2019 to 2020. Responses to questions about TARTs were analyzed. Fisher's exact test was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Of 123 responders, 14 were males with CAH (range 16-54 years) and 109 were parents of males with CAH (son's age range infancy to 37 years). Of all responders, 74% were concerned about the possibility of TARTs, 48% had discussions about TARTs with their endocrinologist, and 42% were aware of possible infertility in males with CAH. There was no difference between responses provided by affected males and parents for these topics (p ≥ 0.08). Among male responders with CAH, 93% had at least one testicular ultrasound, and 77% had undergone more than one. Among parent responders, 30% of their sons had at least one testicular ultrasound, and 61% had more than one. The frequency, total number, and age when the first testicular ultrasound was obtained were inconsistent in both groups. Fifty percent of male responders with CAH and 11% of sons were referred to a urologist for evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Although most responders were concerned about TARTs, less than half recalled discussing this issue with their endocrinologist, and less than half were aware of the possibility of infertility. Although TARTs are most often treated medically, several responders were referred to a urologist. Standardized patient education and consensus guidelines are needed for the surveillance and management of TARTs in males with classic CAH.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».