Aircraft Structures Projects Involving Aviation Museums Across Canada and the United States
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-0447.vid COVID-19 presented a unique challenge to the delivery of aerospace engineering education, and education as a whole. Many universities operated fully online courses for Spring 2020, Fall 2020, and Spring 2021 semesters which required a rapid re-development of these courses as many were not online courses previously. One challenge was to maintain student engagement in the course material, with each other, and with the course instructor through online platforms such as Zoom. An approach taken for the delivery of two, consecutive aircraft structures courses involved the collaboration of 10 aviation museums across Canada and the United States. The 75th anniversary of the Victory in Europe and Victory in Japan occurred in 2020, and a number of aviation museums intended to recognize this important anniversary. COVID-19 limited the events that the museums could provide the public; therefore, participation in the Aircraft Structure Museum Project provided a unique opportunity to commemorate these anniversaries. Each museum provided an aircraft from their collections for groups of 5 to 6 junior level engineering students to analyze. During Fall 2020, the groups analyzed the structures of the wings and stabilizers. The groups were reformed for Spring 2021 and the groups analyzed the fuselage structure. The project was continued in person for Fall 2021 and Spring 2022, this iteration commemorating diversity and inclusion in aerospace. Each group analyzed an aircraft flown by an under-represented minority and learned about the challenges encountered by that individual. The groups provided presentations and reports to the museums detailing their analyses. This interaction provided the opportunity for the students to connect with famous aircraft, famous people, communicate effectively to technical and lay audiences, and motivated the students to engage with each other frequently. Qualitative assessment of the course evaluations using NVIVO show strong alignment with the Wiggins' framework for authentic assessments, and a positive sentiment by the students toward the project. Preliminary surveys of the 2021-2022 students indicate a very positive reaction, with 76\% of students stating that the project helped with their conceptual learning.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».