Assessment of white matter hyperintensity severity using multimodal MRI in Alzheimer’s Disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are clinically significant MRI abnormalities often detected in the elderly and early stages of Alzheimer’s Disease. They are indicative of vascular pathology but represent a mixture of microstructural tissue alterations that is highly variable between individuals. To better understand these alterations, we leveraged the signal of different MRI contrasts sampled within WMHs, which have differential sensitivity to microstructural properties. Subsequently, we sought to examine the asso of these WMH signal measures to clinically-relevant measures such as cortical and global brain atrophy, cognitive function, diagnostic and demographic differences, and Alzheimer’s Disease-relevant cardiovascular risk factors. Our sample of 118 subjects was composed of healthy controls ( n =30), high-risk of Alzheimer’s Disease due to familial history ( n =47), mild cognitive impairment ( n =32), and clinical Alzheimer’s Disease ( n =9) as a means of ascertaining a spectrum of impairment. We sampled the median signal within WMHs on weighted MRI images that are commonly acquired (T1-weighted [T1w], T2-weighted [T2w], T1w/T2w ratio, Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery [FLAIR]), and the relaxation times from quantitative T1 (qT1) and T2* (qT2*) images. Main analyses were performed with a periventricular/deep/superficial white matter parcellation and were repeated with a lobar white matter parcellation. We demonstrated that the correlations between WMH signal measures were variable, suggesting that they are likely influenced by different microstructural properties. We observed that the WMH qT2* and FLAIR measures displayed different age- and disease-related trends compared to normal-appearing white matter, highlighting sensitivity to WMH-specific tissue deterioration. Further, WMH qT2* particularly in periventricular and occipital white matter regions was consistently associated with several of our clinical variables of interest using both parcellation schemes in univariate analyses, and further showed high contributions to a pattern of brain variables that was associated with age and cognitive variables in multivariate Partial Least Squares Correlation analyses. qT1 and FLAIR measures showed consistent clinical relationships in multivariate analyses only, while T1w, T2w, and T1w/T2w ratio measures were not consistently associated with clinical variables. We observed that the qT2* signal was sensitive to clinically-relevant microstructural tissue alterations specific to WMHs. Combining volumetric and signal measures of WMH, particularly qT2* and to a lesser extent qT1 and FLAIR, should be considered to more precisely characterize the severity of WMHs in vivo. These findings may have implications in determining the reversibility of WMHs and potential efficacy of cardio- and cerebrovascular treatments.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».