SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE WITH UPADACITINIB FOR REFRACTORY PEDIATRIC INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND Upadactinib (UPA) was recently approved for ulcerative colitis (UC) for patients 18 and older, and there is promising data for its use in adult Crohn’s disease (CD). It is currently also approved for use in atopic dermatitis (AD) down to the age of 12, but doses used are lower than in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There is currently no data on its use for pediatric IBD; we present here a case series of patients ≤18 years on UPA. METHODS We identified ≤18yo patients who were started on UPA for the indication of IBD +/- AD and completed ≥58 days of therapy at a single, US center. Data, with relevant descriptive statistics, were gathered on demographics, disease subtype, Montreal classification, indication for UPA, time on UPA, number of biologic failures, tofacitinib use, concomitant biologic use, adverse events, and clinical and biomarker remission (8-16 week clinical remission: HBI <5, pMS <3; 2-6 month CRP normalization). RESULTS 12 patients (Median age at UPA start: 16.5y, Interquartile Range [IQR]: 4; 67% female) completed 8 or more weeks (Median [IQR] days: 118 [80]) of UPA (Table 1). Two-thirds of patients had CD. A quarter of patients (25%) had concomitant AD. All patients were diagnosed <17 years, with 67% patients diagnosed below or at the age of ten. The majority of patients (75%) had failed three or more biologics. UPA was used as monotherapy in 50% of patients. Four patients were exposed to and had a partial response to tofacitinib. The majority of patients (75%) had clinically active disease at UPA start. Most patients (83%) were induced with 45 mg, one patient was induced with 30mg, and one patient initiated 15mg as part of AD protocol, later increasing to 30mg. Out of the 12 total patients, 11/12 (92%) were in clinical remission between 8-16 weeks of therapy; in the subset of patients ≤17 years, 6/7 (86%) were in clinical remission. Nine patients had CRP levels measured 2-6 months after initiating UPA treatment; 8/9 (89%) of these patients achieved CRP normalization during this time. No serious adverse events occurred; one patient, who was on UPA monotherapy, developed recurrent styes that responded to hot compresses and antibiotic ointment. Joint involvement (sacroiliitis, arthritis, arthralgias) at the start of their treatment occurred in 3 patients; all of these patients had resolution of joint pain by 8 or more weeks. All patients had previously received vaccination for varicella; no patients were vaccinated for zoster, including the 5 who were 18 years of age. CONCLUSION No new safety signals were seen during induction dosing of UPA in teenage patients with IBD. In this very refractory group, nearly all patients achieved clinical & biomarker remission. Further study on the effectiveness and safety of UPA needs to be performed in pediatric patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».