Enhance the Effectiveness of Collaborative Care by Applying Psychodynamic Principles
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Annual MeetingFull AccessEnhance the Effectiveness of Collaborative Care by Applying Psychodynamic PrinciplesSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:27 Jan 2023https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2023.02.2.40AbstractA session by the American Academy of Psychodynamic Psychiatry and Psychoanalysis will discuss the importance of incorporating psychodynamic and psychoanalytic concepts in a variety of collaborative care models.Psychiatrists’ participation in collaborative care with other health care professionals has increasingly become the way of the future. The ability to provide psychiatric expertise in collaborative care settings is significantly enhanced through the application of psychodynamic principles by allowing patients to be understood on a deeper level.Evaluating patients through a psychodynamic lens in these settings leads to multiple benefits for both patients and physicians. As physicians establish a deeper connection with their patients, the patients experience a stronger attachment to them and feel better understood, which contributes to improved medical outcomes. This inevitably leaves physicians feeling more empowered, which leads to greater job satisfaction and lower levels of burnout.In a presidential symposium at this year’s Annual Meeting in San Francisco titled “Collaborating With Compassion in Contemporary Medical Spaces: A Psychodynamic Seminar,” experts from the American Academy of Psychodynamic Psychiatry and Psychoanalysis (AAPDPP) will discuss the importance of incorporating psychodynamic and psychoanalytic concepts in a variety of collaborative care models. They will give three specific examples of collaborative care settings in which psychodynamics can be used to improve the care of patients and the overall experience of the treatment team.Joanna Chambers, M.D., will discuss how psychodynamic principles are necessary to provide compassionate and patient-centered care while also preventing burnout in health care professionals. Chambers, the immediate past president of AAPDPP, is an associate professor and vice chair for education of clinical psychiatry and an associate professor of clinical OB/GYN at the Indiana University School of Medicine.J.J. Rasimas, M.D., medical director of consultation-liaison and addiction psychiatry at Queen Elizabeth Hospital/PEI in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada, will discuss a case presentation titled “If Mama Ain’t Happy, Nobody’s Happy,” with a focus on ways to incorporate psychodynamically informed concepts in a contemporary medical setting.Danielle Patterson, M.D., an assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at the Indiana University School of Medicine, will explore the use of psychodynamic principles in a transgender outpatient clinic. She will provide a case presentation demonstrating the importance of psychodynamic concepts in the conceptualization of gender when collaborating with other medical professionals in this setting.Jeff Katzman, M.D., professor and vice chair for education of psychiatry at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine and an adjunct clinical professor of psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, will review the use of psychodynamics in Project ECHO Resilience programs, which support first responders and behavioral health professionals. The ECHO model will be described with an emphasis on the development of listening groups.All psychiatrists who have an interest in learning more about the integration of psychodynamic concepts in psychiatric practice are encouraged to attend this session. ■ ISSUES NewArchived
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».