MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4318426693 · doi:10.1353/hcy.2023.0021

The Pedagogy of Images: Depicting Communism for Children ed. by Marina Balina and Serguei Oushakine

2023· article· en· W4318426693 sur OpenAlex
Vita Yakovlyeva

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the history of childhood and youth/˜The œjournal of the history of childhood and youth · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEastern European Communism and Reforms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésModernityCommunismPower (physics)Modernization theoryMediationSociologyPublishingAestheticsModernism (music)Media studiesLawLiteratureSocial scienceArtPolitical sciencePolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Pedagogy of Images: Depicting Communism for Children ed. by Marina Balina and Serguei Oushakine Vita Yakovlyeva The Pedagogy of Images: Depicting Communism for Children. Edited by Marina Balina and Serguei Oushakine. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021. xx + 568 pp. Cloth $95.00, e-book $95.00. In The Pedagogy of Images, the editors present sixteen chapters, conceptually divided into three parts—"mediation," "technology," and "power"—each focusing on a unique aspect of the social performance of children's books. "Mediation" envisions the book as an "institutional framework" for the transition to the new publishing reality (51), "technology" looks at the children's book as a medium for Soviet modernity (207), and "power" contrasts institutionalized modes of power and its everyday "tangible implications" (387), such as experiences of time (chapter 12). The collection illustrates representations of Soviet doctrine to children on gender roles, aesthetics, and other relations that the state constructed with children through publications. Media, technology, and modernization of natural environments are explored, using humor and satire, as sites of children's engagement with early Soviet realities. All contributions are examples of scrupulous research of textual and visual representations, supplemented by a rich selection of high-quality illustrations, many of which are unique and not readily available to either researchers or students, so the volume is visually stunning and entertaining to engage with. All contributions come together in a carefully [End Page 166] crafted selection somewhat favoring the mastery of aesthetic representation—particularly the avant-garde of Soviet modernism of the 1920–40s—and its manifestation in children's publications. The anthology develops an in-depth inquiry into the visual language cultivated by the artistic representations of Soviet modernism, aiming to move "beyond reductionist approaches to studying ideological phenomena" (41). To tackle this goal, the majority of scholars in the anthology seek to convey the sincerity of innovation and quality of its depiction in early Soviet visual art, arguing in favor of its complexity and artistic value. Works of Kazimir Malevich, El Lissitzky, Alisa Poret, Sergei Eisenstein, Dziga Vertov, Vladimir Tatlin, and others are evoked among the examples and influences of an idiosyncratic visual language of Communist discourse cultivated through the era's publications for children, alongside other media such as cinema (chapter 2), photography (chapter 3), and even paper (chapter 5). Although children are present throughout the book—and come forward as actors in the circle of production of Soviet everyday life through their engagement with its materiality (through paper, for example, or do-it-yourself play)—the "pedagogy" that the book analyzes is somewhat relationally reduced. It is a literacy-centered, not a child-centered, pedagogy. It is not reciprocal; it is authoritative and not dialogical. At times, children dissolve into the whirlpools of mechanistic ornamentation within the vast sea of visualizations of Soviet modernistic discourse, of which the child was an instrument (chapter 7). The book makes a contribution to the history of arts and exploration of publications for children as the ground for artistic representation. As such it would be especially interesting to researchers of early Soviet doctrine and its artistic visualization. However, a researcher of childhood studies may find themselves a little disappointed, attempting to grasp the actuality of children's life in the epoch under consideration. The book does not reveal much about the conditions of their lives or their experiences of Communism, or even their positionality within the Soviet "pedagogy." The book does not expand to cover Communist representations of the entire fifteen Soviet republics, either, with a small exception in chapter 5, which includes some data from Ukraine, and chapter 10, which forefronts the colonial "unevenness" of the Soviet Central Asian modernization. The rest of the book is focused on centralized, Russian-language, largely Moscow-based publications—an understandable and yet unacknowledged reality of the Soviet infrastructure, both material and symbolic. [End Page 167] Vita Yakovlyeva University of Alberta Copyright © 2023 Johns Hopkins University Press

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,628
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,956

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle