N05 Highlighting the critical contributions of Inflammatory Bowel Disease nurses in Canada: Perspectives from nurses, gastroenterologists, individuals living with IBD, and caregivers.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Multidisciplinary teams are essential in managing Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). IBD nurses play a critical role in improving patient outcomes and providing cost-effective quality of care. In Canada, access to IBD nurses remain inconsistent. There are more than 270,000 people living with IBD in Canada and fewer than 90 IBD nurses to care for them. This study was conducted to capture the value of IBD nurses, to identify gaps in resources, and to generate strategies for building IBD nurse capacity and enhancing the contributions of IBD nurses in Canada. Methods A convergent mixed-methods design was utilized to gather input from 4 stakeholder groups: IBD nurses, gastroenterologists, individuals living with IBD, and caregivers. Data collection was done through completing a review of the literature, stakeholder surveys, and one-on-one online semi-structured interviews with all stakeholders. Descriptive statistics were used for the quantitative analysis. Semi-structured interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim then thematically analyzed. Results The IBD nurse’s role in clinical care was recognized as a value-add across all stakeholder groups. Having access to a specialized IBD nurse was recognized as a service that elevates the quality and continuity of patient care. As the interface between patients and other healthcare providers, there was recognition amongst stakeholders that IBD nurses are ideally positioned to educate patients about IBD management, general health promotion in the context of chronic disease and may support other aspects of care such as psychosocial, nutrition, and other extraintestinal manifestations or to help guide patients toward appropriate care channels. Many IBD nurses view advocacy as a logical extension of their official responsibilities, helping IBD patients to make treatment decisions and assisting them with disease challenges that affect their quality of life. Conclusion IBD nurses represent an underused resource in Canadian IBD care. Canada currently falls short of the recommended 2.5 full-time IBD nurse equivalents per 250,000 population. Achieving this objective will require a commitment to train IBD nurses and additional funding for their education and employment. The government can work with nursing institutions to set benchmarks, establish training programs, and create opportunities for IBD nurses in Canada. Introducing more IBD nurses into the system and using them to their full capacity makes sense from both a clinical and economic standpoint. It lifts the burden on gastroenterologists and primary care physicians, reduces costs to health systems while improving the overall quality of care for IBD patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,040 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».