DOP42 Efficacy of etrasimod on symptomatic relief in patients with ulcerative colitis: an analysis of the phase 3 ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Patient-reported outcomes such as stool frequency (SF) and rectal bleeding (RB) are important measures of ulcerative colitis (UC) activity and treatment effect. Etrasimod is an investigational, once-daily, oral, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1,4,5 (S1P1,4,5) modulator in development for the treatment of moderately to severely active UC. We evaluated RB and SF subscores to assess symptomatic relief in the ELEVATE UC phase 3 programme. Methods In ELEVATE UC 52 (NCT03945188) and ELEVATE UC 12 (NCT03996369), patients (16-80 years) with moderately to severely active UC were randomised 2:1 to once-daily etrasimod 2 mg or placebo (PBO). ELEVATE UC 52 utilized a treat-through design comprising a 12-week induction period followed by a 40-week maintenance period. ELEVATE UC 12 comprised a 12-week induction period. A key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients with symptomatic remission (SF =0 [or =1 with a ≥1-point decrease from baseline] and RB =0) at week 12 and at week 52. RB and SF subscores, achievement of symptomatic remission, complete symptomatic remission (SF =0 and RB =0), and symptomatic response (≥30% decrease from baseline in composite RB/SF subscores) were assessed at each visit. Achievement of symptomatic remission was also summarized by subgroups in patients with prior biologic/Janus kinase inhibitor (bio/JAKi) use (yes [1, >1], no) and baseline corticosteroid use (yes, no). Results More etrasimod- vs PBO-treated patients achieved symptomatic remission by week 2 in ELEVATE UC 52 (15.3% vs 8.9%; P=0.049) and week 4 in ELEVATE UC 12 (27.5% vs 16.1%; P=0.007). Symptomatic remission increased in etrasimod- vs PBO-treated patients at each time point through week 12 in both ELEVATE UC 52 (46.0% vs 21.5%; P<0.001) and ELEVATE UC 12 (46.8% vs 29.5%; P=0.001) and was maintained through week 52 in ELEVATE UC 52 (43.4% vs 18.5%; P<0.001) (Figure 1A). Achievement of symptomatic response (Figure 1B), and significant improvements in RB and SF subscores, began as early as week 2 or week 4 for etrasimod vs PBO in ELEVATE UC 12 and ELEVATE UC 52, respectively. A significant difference in complete symptomatic remission was achieved at week 4 in both studies (Figure 1C). Subgroup analyses of symptomatic remission suggested a trend towards greater benefit in patients who were bio/JAKi naïve and patients with 1 prior bio/JAKi (vs >1) (Figures 2A-C). Conclusion In this analysis, symptomatic relief was achieved by a greater proportion of patients treated with etrasimod vs PBO as early as week 2 and was sustained through week 52. At week 2, symptomatic response and improvements in RB and SF subscores were observed. The greatest benefits were seen in patients who had no prior exposure to bio/JAKi or 1 prior bio/JAKi therapy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».