P494 Impact of early optimization of ustekinumab on mid-term targets in severe Crohn’s disease: THE MUST study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background As a substantial proportion of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) experiences a refractory disease course, immediate drug intensification may be an option to optimize the effectiveness of current biotherapies. Aim : to compare the one-year efficacy of immediate dose escalation of ustekinumab 90 mg to 4-weekly with that of 8-weekly dosing after intravenous (iv) induction in severe active CD patients. Methods The MUST (meta-optimization of Ustekinumab) study is a real-life multicenter observational French retrospective cohort study including patients with severe active CD. All patients from three academic IBD centers who received induction therapy with IV ustekinumab followed with subcutaneous (sc) UST 90 mg, either 4-weekly (MUST group) or 8-weekly (STD group) were included from Jan 2019 to Dec 2020. The choice of treatment regimen was left at the physician’s discretion. Severe active CD was defined by HBI > 16 and stool frequency (SF) ≥ 4 and abdominal pain (AP) ≥ 2 over one week and at least one objective evidence of inflammation (CRP ≥ 5 mg/L and/or FCal ≥ 250 μg/g and/or radiologic and/or endoscopic signs of disease activity). The primary endpoint was PRO-2 based clinical remission defined by SF≤2-8 and AP ≤1, and either FCal <250 μg/g and/or CRP <5 mg/L at week 52. Key secondary endpoints were PRO-2 remission, endoscopic improvement and steroid-free clinical remission at week 52. Results 203 adult patients were included, either in the MUST group (n = 59) or in the STD group (n = 144). Baseline patient demographics and disease characteristics were similar between groups. Median disease duration was 9 years (IQR: 5 – 14 yrs), 66% were females. Disease location according to the Montreal classification was L1 and L3 in 36% and 44 % of patients. All had previously been exposed to more than one biotherapy, 27% experienced perianal CD, and 35% had undergone previous CD-related surgery. At week 52, the adjusted difference between the two groups for the primary endpoint was 15.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 – 0.94; p = 0.029) with significantly higher clinical remission in the MUST group. The adjusted difference for PRO-2 remission was 3.7% (CI 0.45 - 1.66; p = 0.64). All patients, except one in the STD group, were weaned off steroids at week 52. Endoscopic improvement was similar in both groups (61.9% vs. 61.5%, p=0.98). Adverse events were not significantly different in both arms (42.4% vs 34.7%, p=0.338). Conclusion In the treat-to-target era, our real-life study shows that immediate escalation of ustekinumab therapy to 4-weekly dosing could achieve higher clinical remission at one year than 8-weekly dosing in severe CD. These findings should be confirmed in a dedicated prospective randomized trial.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».