MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4318924158 · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000010021

Superomedial Pedicle Breast Reduction: The Critical View of Safety

2022· article· en· W4318924158 sur OpenAlexaff
Anna J. Skochdopole, Luke Grome, Austin Jiang, Edward M. Reece, Joshua Vorstenbosch, Sebastian Winocour

Notice bibliographique

RevuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBreast Implant and Reconstruction
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineBreast reductionSurgeryParenchymaComplicationDissection (medical)VascularityReduction (mathematics)Plastic surgeryPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Critical view of safety (CVS) was introduced among general surgeons in response to a sudden surge in biliary injuries associated with the increased use of laparoscopy.1 CVS was identified as a safe method for dissection and protection of the cystic duct and artery. A large case series after the implementation of CVS reported no bile duct injuries, suggesting a successful reduction of complications with the introduction of CVS.2 The authors introduce a similar concept regarding identification and protection of the superomedial pedicle during breast reductions for trainee education to avoid pedicle transection. Orlando and Guthrie3 introduced the superomedial pedicle as an alternative to superior pedicle breast reduction in 1975. This technique included incorporation of additional medial parenchyma for improved vascularity of the nipple–areola complex. The superomedial pedicle is widely used by plastic surgeons and has similar complication rates to both the superior and inferior pedicle technique.4 A retrospective review of 938 superomedial reduction mammaplasties reports low complication rates overall, but a 3% partial nipple necrosis complication rate exists.5 Prevention of nipple loss is multifaceted, and protection of the pedicle is of foremost importance. The proposed CVS in superomedial breast reduction can be used by both the novice and experienced plastic surgeon to ensure safe, efficient, and reproducible protection of the pedicle. To obtain the CVS, superomedial breast reduction is carried out in a standard fashion with Wise skin pattern. The pedicle is deepithelized and the breast skin and parenchyma are resected in an en bloc fashion. The superomedial pedicle must then be divided from the lateral breast pillar to facilitate rotation of the pedicle for final inset. During this step, CVS is used to prevent surgical errors. CVS is defined by three anatomic landmarks: superomedial pedicle, lateral pillar, and breast meridian (Fig. 1, left).Fig. 1.: (Left) Standard Wise pattern superomedial breast reduction with resection of skin and parenchyma before division of the superomedial pedicle and lateral pillar. (Right) The critical view of safety as defined by the superomedial pedicle, breast meridian, and lateral pillar. Dissection is carried out along the trajectory of the breast meridian. Illustration by Scott Holmes, CMI. Copyright Baylor College of Medicine.To define the CVS clearly, the surgeon uses an allis clamp to pull the pedicle upward and medially while the assistant uses an allis clamp to pull the lateral pillar in an upward and lateral direction to create tension over the breast meridian (Fig. 1, right). Division of the superomedial pedicle from the lateral pillar may then be carried out following the course of the breast meridian. [See Video (online), which demonstrates division of the superomedial pedicle from the lateral breast pillar using the critical view of safety. The surgeon uses an allis clamp to pull the pedicle upward and medially while the assistant uses an allis clamp to pull the lateral pillar in an upward and lateral direction to create tension over the breast meridian. Division of the superomedial pedicle from the lateral pillar may then be carried out following the course of the breast meridian.] Before division, the CVS should be agreed on in a time-out fashion. Use of CVS avoids dissection medially, which would threaten the pedicle, or laterally, which could result in unintentional violation of the skin or hollowing of the lateral breast. The surgeon should take care to reassess the trajectory over the breast meridian continuously. {"href":"Single Video Player","role":"media-player-id","content-type":"play-in-place","position":"float","orientation":"portrait","label":"Video.","caption":"This video demonstrates division of the superomedial pedicle from the lateral breast pillar using the critical view of safety. The surgeon uses an allis clamp to pull the pedicle upward and medially while the assistant uses an allis clamp to pull the lateral pillar in an upward and lateral direction to create tension over the breast meridian. Division of the superomedial pedicle from the lateral pillar may then be carried out following the course of the breast meridian.","object-id":[{"pub-id-type":"doi","id":""},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-stream-id","id":"1_of1uf4uv"},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-source","id":"Kaltura"}]} Implementation of CVS is a simple and reproducible way to protect the superomedial pedicle in breast reduction. CVS should be implemented by plastic surgeons to aid in trainee education, decrease preventable technical errors, and increase efficiency in the operating room. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors thank Scott Holmes, CMI, a member of the Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery at Baylor College of Medicine, for assistance with the figure. DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,912
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,248
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgeryMême sujetBreast Implant and ReconstructionTravaux en français237 207