<i>Lawyers in Conflict and Transition</i> By KieranMcEvoy, LouiseMallinder, and AnnaBryson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, 440 pp., £85.00
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Lawyers in Conflict and Transition is an invaluable study of how 'lawyers as "real people" . . .respond to the challenges of conflict, authoritarianism, and transition' (pp. 1, 298).Its main contribution to a growing literature on 'cause lawyering' lies in the careful analysis of material from 131 interviews with mostly lawyers, but also some judges and academics, from six jurisdictions (Cambodia, Chile, Israel, Palestine, South Africa, and Tunisia), all of which are 'pressurised environments wherein the rule of law is undermined and subverted' (p.298).I will explain why, while much of the analysis may seem to suggest deep pessimism about the prospects for cause lawyering, the book nevertheless contains an optimistic message.The authors -Kieran McEvoy, Louise Mallinder, and Anna Bryson -tell the reader at the outset that they are 'human rights activists who have for many years been directly involved in trying to find lawful and human-rights-compliant solutions to deal with the legacy of . . .[the] conflict' in the 'complex political' society in which they all work and live: Northern Ireland (p.3).They include within their scope lawyers whose 'cause' is on the right of the political spectrum, as well as a whole chapter on the neglected role of government lawyers.However, for the most part, they study cause lawyers on the liberal-left side of the political spectrum -that is, those who are either devoted to the pursuit of human rights for their own sake, or take up that pursuit because they see it as useful to advance the political cause that is their primary loyalty: the overthrow of some repressive and unjust regime.However, the pursuit of justice -the cause of both kinds of lawyers -is not an explicit theme of the book since the authors' methodology is a 'comparative sociology of lawyering perspective' (p.298).In fact, if every aspirant cause lawyer were to read this book, as every such person most definitely should, the result could be one that the authors surely could not intend: a world without cause lawyers.For aspirant cause lawyers would learn that their career would be for the most part one of helping to legitimate the illegitimate -a morally fraught, perhaps even morally tainted, endeavour, in which they might hope at best to 'at times' be 'key to nudging politics and politicians towards more rule-of-law-compliant compromises and accommodations' (p.304).Moreover, against that hope, they would have to weigh the fact that while, as the authors note,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,032 | 0,014 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».