Notice bibliographique
Résumé
“People cannot achieve their fullest health potential unless they are able to take control of those things which determine their health” declares the Ottawa Charter, the founding statement on the promotion of health from the World Health Organization (1986).1 Yet to “take control” of the determinants of health—such as the obesogenic risks in the environment—can be hard for any person, but perhaps especially hard for younger people, who may have neither the resources nor the political influence to challenge the status quo. The first step is to recognize the value of youth involvement in the process of designing and implementing policies concerning obesity. Young people from across the globe truly have bright and innovative ideas that, of course, may sometimes differ from those of adults, but are by no means less valuable due to the fact that youngsters have their own unique perspective on the matters that the older generations are currently dealing with. Furthermore, young people such as myself will live with the results of those policies in the upcoming decades and therefore, it is crucial for us to get a chance to have an impact on our future. When it comes to health-related policies, young people are particularly interested because more and more teenagers suffer from, for instance, obesity or diabetes. Additionally, a common interest in these topics may be observed these days because youngsters—in general—have acquired a clear understanding of the importance of leading a healthy lifestyle. To give an example, I myself am a type 1 diabetic and that is why I have been familiarizing myself with the disease, healthy nutrition/lifestyle, and the general situation of people coping with diabetes or any complications of it in my country for the past 6 years. Indirectly, this is also the main reason why I decided to join the CO-CREATE Youth Declaration Task Force (see www.co-create.eu) when the opportunity of applying for a place in the program arose—I wanted to share the knowledge that I had previously gained. Even though the declaration may and should be further improved, we strongly believe that these four statements—if implemented by policymakers and other stakeholders—would drive change in the field. However, we cannot make these changes alone. We are not able to act without any help from the authorities and that is exactly why we want to be heard, carefully listened to, and included in the process of bringing the demands into effect. Then, together, we can truly “take control” and influence not only the present, but also the future.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,026 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».