First report of anthracnose on sugar beet (<i>Beta vulgaris</i>) caused by <i>Colletotrichum incanum</i> in Michigan, USA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 2016, sugar beet leaf samples were received at the Michigan State University plant diagnostic laboratory with distinctive oblong lesions on the petiole (Fig. 1). The lesions contained acervuli with dark setae (Fig. 2). Lesions on the blade had light and dark rings that showed similar acervuli in a 90% humidity chamber. Pure cultures from single spore isolation were grown on malt extract agar (MEA). The resulting cultures produced acervuli-like structures with dark setae distributed throughout the conidiomata. Spores were curved and had a distinct gutule (Fig. 3). Based on these characteristics, isolates were identified as a Colletotrichum sp. A representative isolate, Co16-4, was grown in liquid V8 medium with shaking for seven days. Fungal tissue was lyophilised and DNA extracted using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Partial sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), actin (ACT), and β-tubulin (TUB2) genes were amplified according to Damm et al. (2009) and submitted to the Research Technology Support Facility (East Lansing, USA) for Sanger sequencing. Sequences were compared to data in GenBank where ITS gave the closest match to C. spaethianum (>98%), while ACT and TUB2 gave the closest match to C. incanum (99 and 96%, respectively). Sequences were submitted to GenBank as Accession Nos. OP628186 (ITS), OP627081 (ACT) and OP627082 (TUB2). Due to the BLAST search ambiguity, sequences of 19 Colletotrichum species were retrieved from GenBank as identified in Yang et al. (2014). Sequences were concatenated and manually adjusted using Geneious Prime 2021.1.1 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand). Alignment and a maximum-likelihood tree were generated in Mega version 11.0.13 (Tamura et al., 2021) using the Tamura-Nei substitution model with 1000 bootstrap replicates (Fig. 4). Based on this data, isolate Co16-4 was identified as Colletotrichum incanum. Koch's postulates were fulfilled by spraying sugar beet foliage (C869) at the 10- to 12-leaf growth stage with 10ml of a spore suspension (1×104/ml with 0.1% Tween 20). After seven days, an oblong lesion was observed on the petiole and irregular lesions developed on inoculated leaves. No lesions were observed on control plants. A morphologically identical Colletotrichum sp. was isolated from lesions. Colletotrichum incanum has been reported on soybean (Yang et al., 2014), but to our knowledge, no Colletotrichum spp. have been reported causing anthracnose on beet in the United States. The symptoms and morphology of the lesions on sugar beets are consistent with beet anthracnose reported in Japan and Canada which was attributed to C. dematium (Chiko et al., 1984; Gourley, 1966). In Japan, a radish isolate, originally identified as C. dematium, was recently identified as C. incanum (Gan et al., 2016). Leaves with similar lesions were found in commercial sugarbeet fields in 2021 and 2022, indicative of continuing disease presence, but yield effects are unknown.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».