Dutton's Dirty Diggers: Bertha P. Dutton and the Senior Girl Scout Archaeological Camps in the American Southwest, 1947–1957
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
How is it possible that I did not know about Dutton's Dirty Diggers and their excellent adventures in the American Southwest? Why didn't I get to go on an Archaeological Mobile Camp when I was a teenager? I knew nothing about this fascinating chapter of southwestern archaeology, Dr. Bertha Dutton, or the more than two hundred senior girl scouts who used the road less traveled to learn about the archaeology, cultures, and environment of the magnificent Southwest.Bertha P. Dutton, an archaeologist and ethnologist, was truly a giant and an unsung heroine of archaeology, cultural outreach, and public education in the years when America was emerging from World War II amidst great societal changes. Catherine Fowler's Dutton's Dirty Diggers is a fine tribute to Dutton, who planned and led expeditions of teenage girls into remote regions of the Southwest for eleven years. In the later years of the program, she even involved veteran mobile campers in real archaeological excavations at Pueblo Largo. Her work became a model for Girl Scouts USA's programs for older girls for thirty years.Born in 1903, Bertha, or “Bert” as she was known to most, developed a lifelong interest in cultures and ancient history. In the 1930s, she attended the University of New Mexico where she studied archaeology, ethnology, and geology. Eventually, she earned a doctoral degree in anthropology and worked in the field throughout her life. Bert devoted much of her time “to educating the public about lifeways of the Indigenous peoples of the region and their histories. . . . She firmly believed that sound information led to better and more nuanced and genuine cross-cultural understanding—a strong message of cultural anthropology to which she was fully committed” (12–13).I am particularly impressed with the curriculum for the Archaeological Mobile Camps, which typically used two-week on-the-trail experiences to focus on “centers of great archaeological importance . . . Pueblo and Navajo Indian territory . . . [and] the greatest wonders of nature” (78). In her message from 1950, Bert described the program: En route, a program constituting a study of human life in its out-of-door setting will be conducted, and with the natural world for its laboratory, and with both ancient and living communities for its books. This camp will introduce to the young citizens of the United States, the anthropological background of the Southwest, and will serve to widen and sharpen their perspective of the science of man from the standpoint of general education and culture (79, emphasis in original).Dutton was clearly far ahead of her time for her inclusion of living communities in the understanding of past cultures and the cultural geography of the twentieth century. In the twenty-first century, non-Native people in many parts of the United States rarely have a chance to meet an Indigenous person. Under Bert's careful planning, more than two hundred young women (Bert's “daughters”) got to meet Indigenous peoples in their home territory and learn about their cultures directly from them. It must have been a significant experience for many of them judging from the paths their lives took into advanced degrees in anthropology, biology, and history. The author, a Digger herself, earned a doctoral degree in anthropology, taught at the University of Nevada, Reno, and specialized “in ethnoarchaeological, ethnobiological, and linguistic research of Great Basin Indigenous peoples” (235). At least two Diggers became lawyers. Many became nurses and teachers who taught a wide variety of subjects. Others went on to become artists and musicians. Those who did not pursue careers maintained their interest in history and archaeology and cultivated knowledge both locally and in other parts of the world. Many remained involved in scouting for much of their adult lives. When Bert was asked if she thought she had any influence on her “Digger Daughters,” she was characteristically modest, “I guess I gave some guidance . . . . or just as a friend” (239).Dutton's Dirty Diggers is a good read for anyone interested in the history of archaeology education in the Southwest, the history of the Girl Scouts of the USA, or the changing face of the nation after the war. Bumping over unpaved roads in ancient vehicles with at least one flat tire almost every day, transporting water in a dry environment, camp cooking, and flooded tents: the girls loved it and sang their hearts out the entire trip. While I thoroughly enjoyed the book, I must confess that I cringed a bit when reading about the removal of human remains during excavations at Pueblo Largo. Although I understand that it happened and was accurately reported, I was surprised to find no explanation of this extremely sensitive issue and its ramifications for archaeological practice since the late-twentieth century.Thank you for showing me a part of southwestern history that I never knew and a wonderful portrait of a life so well lived. I laughed, I cried, and I will never forget Bertha Dutton and her Dirty Diggers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».