Technology Focus: Production and Facilities (December 2022)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented circumstances affecting production and facilities. Restrictions in mobility between sites and reduction in manpower challenged the business continuity of several operations. This accelerated the development and implementation of various technological solutions. We can see many examples in the works submitted this year: drone surveillance, inspection robots, digital twins, and automated systems. The digitalization tendency brought by the fourth industrial revolution continues to be the dominant topic of the works submitted. Approximately 28% were on simulation and modeling, of which one-third used machine learning. A total of 9% addressed intelligent management systems, 5% robotics and drones, 3% 3D printing, and 1.5% digital twins and augmented reality. The main topics addressed were inspection and maintenance (20%), flow assurance (7%), corrosion (6%), drilling (6%), nonmetallic materials (3%), and debottlenecking (2%). A few papers were on clean energy subjects, such as hydrogen energy and wind turbines (2%). I would like to highlight the following works as promising technological developments for production and facilities: innovative measurement techniques, such as the development of a new adjustable cone meter that adapts automatically to flow conditions of wet and dry gas (paper SPE 207505); improvements to drilling safety, such as the design of a new casing connector that significantly reduces rig time and health, safety, and environmental exposure risks (paper OTC 31075); new developments in piping inspection, such as the combination of direct-response spectroscopy with microwave for inspection of hard-to-inspect piping with coatings and overwraps (paper IPTC 21799); and a very interesting study of triangular vs. circular cross-sectional pipes, which shows that triangular pipes and elbows have significant less erosion, better heat transfer properties, and reduced slug frequencies for multiphase flow (paper SPE 208101). In the matter of optimizing production, debottlenecking continues to be a challenge. Whether it is for increase of production needs or for handling greater water cuts from aging wells, new technological solutions are arising to make production facilities increasingly efficient. Paper IPTC 22365 discusses dual-frequency AC/DC desalting technology. It shows a reduction in costs and energy requirements while achieving superior basic sediment and water removal. One of the topics becoming more relevant is the reduction of CO2 emissions. At least 5% of the abstracts I reviewed addressed lowering CO2 emissions as their main topic. Energy harvesting is an economically interesting way to reduce emissions because the energy consumption of the facility is reduced. The study shown in paper OTC 31724 describes energy harvesting from hydraulic pressure drops as an example of the circular economy applied to oil-production facilities. In this study, the energy and costs savings were evaluated at different pressure-drop points of a gas/oil separation plant. Paper SPE 207096 uses pinch analysis to perform a detailed heat-exchange-network retrofitting study of a crude distillation unit, predicting 8% of energy savings. I sincerely hope that we can see more developments in this area in coming years. Recommended additional reading at OnePetro: www.onepetro.org. IPTC 21799 Effectiveness of Dynamic-Response Spectroscopy and Microwave-Inspection Technology for Substrate Pipe and Composite Wraps by Rehan Ahmed, Petronas, et al. OTC 31075 Premium Antirotation Casing Connector With Metal-to-Metal Seal Optimized for High-Fatigue Performance To Meet Market Needs by Reducing Operational Expenditure and Risk Exposure by Scott Patrick Ellisor, Dril-Quip, et al. SPE 207096 A Practical Approach to Energy Optimization Using Pinch Analysis: A Case Study of an Oil Refinery by Paschal Uzoma Ndunagu, Honeywell, et al. OTC 31724 Circular Economy Initiatives at Upstream Surface Facilities by Ahmed Khalid Bu Ali, Aramco, et al.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».