MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4320185539 · doi:10.1353/asp.2023.0002

Introduction: The Rise of Asian State Actors in the Arctic

2023· article· en· W4320185539 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angela Yee‐Moon Wang

Notice bibliographique

RevueAsia policy · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArcticFrontierPolitical scienceChinaGeographyArctic ecologyNatural resourceState (computer science)EconomyOceanographyEconomicsLawGeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction:The Rise of Asian State Actors in the Arctic Angela Wang (bio) Traditionally an isolated and low-tension region, the Arctic is known for its extraordinary beauty and pristine wilderness. The region is recognized as one of the last resource-rich frontiers—it holds 22% of the world's oil and natural gas resources, is home to more than 21,000 known species, and contains two commercially viable shipping routes that could potentially reshape the future of international trade.1 As the sea ice over the central Arctic Ocean has long kept the region inaccessible, Arctic affairs have customarily been prioritized on the policy agendas of only the eight Arctic states—Canada, Denmark (via Greenland), Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden, and the United States. However, this situation has begun to change in recent decades as the region becomes more accessible due to climate change, ecological degradation, and a consequent rise in economic and geostrategic opportunities. The Arctic is now a new frontier that has piqued the interest of international actors, especially ones from the Asia-Pacific region. In 2013, at the Kiruna Ministerial Meeting in Sweden, the Arctic Council granted China, Japan, India, South Korea, and Singapore the status of observer states.2 The Arctic Council is a critical governmental forum for Arctic cooperation with decisions made by the eight Arctic nations and the permanent participants.3 Although observer members are limited to observation of the work of the council and involvement in specific working groups, prior to the Kiruna decision the council's observer states only comprised European countries. The admission of these Asian observers was [End Page 5] a pivotal moment, as it signifies Asian states' increased interest in the Arctic and that the circumpolar Arctic is no longer isolated, as globalization and international cooperation in the region have become ever more evident. Since their admission, China, Japan, South Korea, and Singapore have emerged in particular from being peripheral to active members in Arctic affairs. Off to a flying start, these four non-Arctic Asian states have deployed scientific diplomacy and engaged in climate, environmental, shipping, energy, and fishing research to pave their way into Arctic affairs and find their niche. Understanding the Arctic's increased accessibility and the world's rising energy demand, China, Japan, and South Korea have also published their own Arctic policy frameworks, expanding their Arctic ambitions in economic domains. China has pushed to construct a "Polar Silk Road" in the Arctic Ocean to increase global trade and stimulate the nation's economic growth, while Japan and South Korea were heavily invested in different Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects in the Arctic prior to Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Perceptions of the Arctic States Despite Asian newcomers' keen regional engagement and interest, the Arctic states have always been cautious and vigilant for any signs of non-Arctic presence. Especially as the eight Arctic states already have unresolved disputes over territory, maritime delimitation, and exclusive economic zones, the presence of new actors in the circumpolar region could add a layer of complexity to the region's security, development, and governance. As a result, Asian states' engagement in the high north has been under scrutiny ever since their application to become observers in the Arctic Council. For example, during the application process, the Arctic Council set up the recognition of "sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction" of the Arctic states as a new application criterion.4 Russia and Canada also contended that the Arctic region should not be "internationalized" and were hesitant to grant China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and India observer status in 2013.5 China's self-proclaimed "near Arctic state" identity remains a further contested topic that provokes mixed feelings from different Arctic nations. [End Page 6] Despite the frenzy over admission of the Asian observers to the Artic Council, Canada and the United States have rarely interacted with these newcomers since their admission. Unlike the European Arctic states—Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, and Sweden—that have cultivated robust economic and scientific ties with the Asian Arctic newcomers, Canada's and the United States' diplomatic engagement on northern affairs has been restricted to other Arctic states. The two North...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,914
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,978

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,341
Écart entre enseignants0,316 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAsia policyMême sujetArctic and Russian Policy StudiesTravaux en français237 207