MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4320481704 · doi:10.1093/plcell/koad035

Reeling in countless effectors (RICE): time-course transcriptomics of rice blast disease reveal an expanded effector repertoire for<i>Magnaporthe oryzae</i>

2023· letter· en· W4320481704 sur OpenAlexaff
Bradley Laflamme

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Plant Cell · 2023
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyBlast diseaseEffectorRepertoireMagnaportheOryza sativaPlant disease resistanceBotanyMagnaporthe griseaCell biologyGeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Call them “empty carbs” if you want, but we owe them immensely: the major grass crops (maize, wheat, and rice) collectively account for about half of the global caloric intake. Unfortunately, our global dependance on grasses has inadvertently promoted some of the most destructive fungal phytopathogens, such as Magnaporthe oryzae, the causal agent of rice blast disease. The life cycle of M. oryzae occurs in three main steps spores land on rice plants, specialized cells called appressoria to penetrate host tissues, and then the pathogens thrive, spreads, and kill its host to feed before sporulating to spread further (Wilson and Talbot 2009). However, there remain several gaps in our knowledge about how the pathogen's virulence strategies evolve over the course of this dynamic infection cycle. The secretion of “effector” virulence proteins in host cells is known to underlie these virulence traits to some extent, but M. oryzae, like most fungal pathogens, has only had a portion of its effector repertoire revealed and appreciably studied in the context of its highly varied lifestyle. In this issue, Yan et al. (2023) take a holistic view of the M. oryzae-rice interaction using RNA-seq and offer the most comprehensive picture yet painted of the M. oryzae effector repertoire. While RNA-seq has previously been used to study M. oryzae disease development (Shimizu et al. 2019), Yan et al. made several adjustments to improve the resolution of fungal gene expression across the pathogen's multifaceted infection cycle. This included the use of multiple infection methods, two cultivars of varying sensitivity to M. oryzae, and eight time points covering a range of the most important stages in disease development (see Fig. 1). Schematic representation of the eight stages of M. oryzae infection used in this study, highlighting the gradual penetration, proliferation, and sporulation of M. oryzae over a 144-h period. The distinct gene co-expression modules relevant to each stage of infection are noted beside each timepoint. Reprinted from Yan et al. (2023), Figure 2B. Across a six-day infection time course, the group identified ten modules of co-expressed fungal genes that frequently corresponded to key phases in the pathogen's life cycle, such as appressorium development, necrotrophy, or conidiation. These modules captured not only many of the well-characterized genes involved in specific physiological processes (e.g. genes involved in appressorium development), but also the broader metabolic shifts that are known to occur over the course of M. oryzae infection, such as the switch toward secondary metabolism in the later necrotrophic stages. Having established the stage-specific transcriptome of infecting M. oryzae, Yan et al. then set their sights on elucidating the entire effector repertoire of M. oryzae—that is, all the predicted secreted proteins that might be expressed throughout infection, which may interfere with host defenses and/or aid in an infection. They identified a whopping 863 differentially accumulated transcripts encoding predicted secreted proteins, with 546 being annotated as effectors. Based on structural predictions with AlphaFold and ChimeraX (Seong and Krasileva 2021), these 546 effectors were split into hundreds of structural clusters, suggesting their involvement in a wide range of biological processes. Several clusters had interesting expression signatures across the infection time course. For example, the well-studied MAX (Magnaporthe oryzae avirulence and ToxB-like) effectors, as well as putative ADP-ribosyltransferase effectors, both appeared to be upregulated only during certain stages of biotrophic development, suggesting these structurally distinct effectors have overlapping roles in virulence. Yan et al. further characterized many of these putative effectors with an impressive array of functional assays. This included building effector-GFP fusions to assess subcellular localization and stage-specificity, validating the secretion of several effectors in planta, and showing that one novel effector, Mep1, confers a fitness advantage to M. oryzae during rice colonization. These experiments functionally validate the transcriptomic approach for the discovery of fungal effectors, while hinting at the hundreds of other possible functional pathways involved. Standing alongside recent insights into the structure and evolution of fungal effectors (Seong and Krasileva 2023), this study by Yan et al. should invigorate fungal phytopathologists, who are becoming more and more invested in identifying and functionally cataloging effectors. The structural and regulatory complexity of fungal effectors has long made their study difficult relative to those of bacteria, but it is exciting to see that advances in genomics, transcriptomics, and structural biology may see fungi quickly catch up to the prokaryotes.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,017

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0110,011
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Plant CellMême sujetPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityTravaux en français237 207