Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For a young Canadian composer at the beginning of the 1970s, the decision to study in Europe was not uncommon. In Vivier’s case, had encouragement been needed, it would have come amply from Gilles Tremblay, who had himself as a younger man studied in Europe for a period of seven years. Study in Europe was more than simply a “finishing school”: in the eyes of an important minority in Quebec it was a passport toward an international career and a crucial step away from parochialism. Relatively few of Vivier’s fellow students at the Conservatoire followed suit—Michel-Georges Brégent and Walter Boudreau, for example, were too committed to their bands and their various other musical activities to think of leaving Quebec at this point—but quite a few of them came to Europe in the summers, and occasionally for longer periods. During the three years he would spend in Europe, Vivier would see various Montreal friends from time to time and even make the acquaintance of people who would remain friends back home, such as the Spanish-born José Evangelista. For Quebec composers, however, the destination of choice had overwhelmingly been France. The two most prominent figures of the Montrealbased musical avant-garde, Tremblay and Garant, had both spent important years in Paris; Vivier’s decision to study in Germany was unusual. The first address we have for him in Europe, on a document dated June 20, 1971, is on Stürzelberger Weg in Köln-Worringen, the most northern part of Cologne. The fact that the document in question is his registration form for study at the Institute of Sonology in the Netherlands, however, is significant. He had come to Cologne in May in hopes of studying with Stockhausen, then newly appointed as a professor at the Hochschule there, but was, at first, refused. Clarence Barlow, who also applied that summer, tells the story: Stockhausen I know took offense at his looks and his smell—Claude had this sheepskin coat which exuded a certain sheep odor—and maybe his way of talking, which had a certain namby-pamby quality. Stockhausen gave us a job to do—we were supposed to write something based on the formula from his Mantra ; each one of us got a photocopy of the formula. So we all sat around this table—we had two or maybe three hours to write a piece.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,031 | 0,019 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».